Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Margot Yerolymos vs Celine Naef Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yerolymos vs Naef analysis and find out who is favored!
Margot Yerolymos vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yerolymos has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Naef has won 47.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yerolymos, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naef has won 54.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yerolymos has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naef has saved 57.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yerolymos has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Naef winning 55.93% (W/L 33/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yerolymos has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 39/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 49/ 54). Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 20/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Yerolymos winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Yerolymos winning 0 and Naef winning 2. The last match between Yerolymos and Naef was at the W15 Reims, 06-10-2022, Second, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Yerolymos and Naef have played a deciding set 0 times, with Yerolymos winning 0 times and Naef 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Yerolymos winning 0, and Naef 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yerolymos has played against opponents with an average rank of while Naef has played against players with an average rank of 208.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yerolymos has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naef has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yerolymos has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naef has converted 42.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Yerolymos 0 - 1 Naef
858
Rank
306
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
158
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (246-183)
Career Total W/L
68% (84-39)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (14-10)
$22,359
Career Prize Money
$169,770
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Margot Yerolymos | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (32/63) | 57% (27/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 41% (13/32) | 78% (21/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (13/31) | 45% (9/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 50% (6/12) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (17/47) | 59% (37/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Margot Yerolymos
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Margot Yerolymos | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (14/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (34/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (285/225) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 87 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:39:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 168.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (1009/1669) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (693/1009) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (313/660) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (96/223) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (769/1699) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Margot Yerolymos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Margot Yerolymos
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
110)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mallaurie Noel
Player
Margot Yerolymos
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Amira Ben Aissa
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Margot Yerolymos
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Veronika Podrez
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Margot Yerolymos
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Celine Naef
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Celine Naef
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Joanna Garland
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Celine Naef
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
86%
(
30 of
35)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Tereza Martincova
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Yerolymos Vs Naef Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
