Prediction of Margaux Komano [] vs Masha Lazarenko [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L W W W L W W L W L
Form
W L W L W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Komano 1 - 0 Lazarenko
They have played 2 sets in total, with Komano winning 2 and Lazarenko winning 0. The last match between Komano and Lazarenko was at the W15 Monastir, 11-03-2025, Q3, Hard with Margaux Komano getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Margaux Komano | 1 |
Masha Lazarenko | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Margaux Komano
Player
Masha Lazarenko
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:54:48 | Average Match Time | 1:54:48 |
73% (59/81) | 1st Serve % | 78% (51/65) |
61% (36/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (23/51) |
36% (8/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (9/14) |
67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
51% (33/65) | Return Points Win % | 46% (37/81) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Margaux Komano vs Masha Lazarenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Komano 1 - 0 Lazarenko
Editorial Prediction:
How does Komano's second serve performance stack up against Lazarenko’s? In the past six months, Komano has secured 40.09% of points on their second serve, in stark contrast to Lazarenko’s 0%. Is there a correlation between second serve proficiency and predicting match outcomes? Absolutely, a strong second serve can often tip the scales in a player’s favor.
When it comes to return games, does Komano have an edge? Recently, Komano has managed to win 42.63% of points against their opponent's second serve, leaving Lazarenko, once again, with 0%. On first serve returns, Komano’s success rate stands at 36.81%, while Lazarenko has yet to win a point. These figures are crucial in forecasting who might prevail in this head-to-head showdown.
Consider the matter of pressure: Can Komano handle it better than Lazarenko? Evidently so, as Komano has successfully saved 42.86% of breakpoints when faced with them. Meanwhile, Lazarenko has yet to save a breakpoint. Such statistics are invaluable for those indulging in in-game betting.
From a performance overview perspective, who has had the better run over the last year? While Komano has won half of their matches (23 wins and 23 losses), Lazarenko boasts a slightly higher winning percentage at 57.14% (12 wins and 9 losses).
Where do these players show promise based on their career best surfaces? Komano shines on indoor hard courts with a win percentage of 50%, compared to Lazarenko's 67% on outdoor hard courts. Oddly, both players struggle on clay, though Lazarenko fares slightly better.
Discussing player experience, Komano, who often competes in Futures, Satellites, and $10k ITF tournaments, has a win rate of 51.28%. Meanwhile, Lazarenko, navigating similar tournament waters, maintains a higher win percentage of 57.14%. It’s essential to account for the level of events they participate in when determining a favorite.
Does the quality of their opponents offer any insight? Over the past year, Komano faced opponents averaging a rank of 218.2, while Lazarenko’s average opponent rank was 154.24. Higher-ranked opponents often signal more rigorous competition.
When deciding sets come into play, who fares better? Historically, Lazarenko demonstrates a stronger finish with a 67% deciding set win rate, while Komano holds steady at 50%.
What about their breakpoint conversion in-game? Komano has converted 51.16% of their opportunities, a stark contrast to Lazarenko, who remains at 0%. Such statistics can be pivotal for live betting enthusiasts.
Given all these factors, it seems like Komano possesses a slight edge in their upcoming clash. While Lazarenko has shown superior performance metrics in some areas, Komano's capabilities under pressure and on returns might just grant them the advantage they need to secure victory.
Margaux Komano Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Vilma Krebs Hyllested
Player
Margaux Komano
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Josy Daems
Player
Margaux Komano
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Margaux Komano
Player
Linda Salvi
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
51%
(
40 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Margaux Komano
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
76%
(
22 of
29)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
7 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Margaux Komano
Player
Emma Slavikova
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Margaux Komano
Player
Masha Lazarenko
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gloria Ceschi
Player
Margaux Komano
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
24 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
55
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Masha Lazarenko Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mavie Osterreicher
Player
Masha Lazarenko
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 1-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Masha Lazarenko
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Masha Lazarenko
Player
Alessia Popescu
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Margaux Komano
Player
Masha Lazarenko
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
45% (96/115) | Win/Loss | 56% (23/18) |
46% (221/258) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (50/41) |
49% (2216/2314) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (468/420) |
0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
62 | Aces Total | 1 |
0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
266 | Total Double Faults | 27 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
285.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 170.61 |
70% (4276/6151) | 1st Serve % | 69% (460/669) |
55% (2349/4276) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (244/460) |
40% (754/1875) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (83/209) |
50% (337/672) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (35/78) |
45% (2699/5989) | Return Points Win % | 44% (299/672) |
45% (95/209) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (22/40) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
34% (11/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
49% (29/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) |
87% (95/83) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (20/19) |
13% (95/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (20/1) |
10% (116/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (21/4) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...