Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marek Gengel vs Zane Khan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gengel vs Khan analysis and find out who is favored!
Marek Gengel vs Zane Khan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gengel has won 52.85% of points on his second serve, while Khan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gengel, in recent form, has won 55.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Khan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gengel has saved 63.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Khan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gengel has won 59.26% of matches played (W/L 32/ 22), with Khan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gengel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 200/ 107), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Khan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 57/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gengel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.11% of matches (W/L 32/ 13), where as Khan has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gengel winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gengel winning 0 and Khan winning 2. The last match between Gengel and Khan was at the M15 Jerusalem, 14-05-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Zane Khan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gengel and Khan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gengel winning 0 times and Khan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gengel winning 0, and Khan 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gengel has played against opponents with an average rank of 135.04 while Khan has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gengel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Khan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gengel has converted 44.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Khan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gengel 0 - 1 Khan
521
Rank
256
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
404
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
57% (301-230)
Career Total W/L
65% (62-34)
76% (25-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,280
Career Prize Money
$2,555
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marek Gengel | Zane Khan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 11 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (49/85) | 64% (46/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (37/49) | 76% (35/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (17/36) | 69% (18/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 26% (19/72) | 36% (31/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Zane Khan
Player
Marek Gengel
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
4
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marek Gengel | Zane Khan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (25/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (53/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (394/284) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 76% (25/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 155 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:38 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 116.88 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1432/2081) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1038/1432) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (347/648) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (108/245) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (930/2183) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (25/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (25/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (25/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (25/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Karim-Mohamed Maamoun
Player
Marek Gengel
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Kris Van Wyk
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Matthew Hulme
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
114
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Marek Gengel
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Lorenzo Lorusso
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Marek Gengel
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Zane Khan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Zane Khan
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Zane Khan
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
46 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Damir Dzumhur
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Zane Khan
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
2)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
6
Total Points Won
0
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Takuto Niki
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Pedro Araujo
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Zane Khan
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gengel Vs Khan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
