Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marcus Mansson vs Jakob ARVIDSSON Ehn Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mansson vs Ehn analysis and find out who is favored!
Marcus Mansson vs Jakob ARVIDSSON Ehn Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mansson has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ehn has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mansson, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ehn has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mansson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ehn has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mansson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ehn winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mansson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 32/ 31), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Ehn has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mansson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ehn has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mansson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ehn has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mansson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ehn has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mansson 0 - 0 Ehn
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marcus Mansson | Jakob ARVIDSSON Ehn |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Marcus Mansson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Jan Zielinski
Player
Marcus Mansson
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
12
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(3) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Marcus Mansson
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 7-6(2) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Almir Nokic
Player
Marcus Mansson
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin Chahoud
Player
Marcus Mansson
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25
Total Points Won
13
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joffrey De Schepper
Player
Marcus Mansson
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Stevens
Player
Marcus Mansson
48%
(
39 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
5
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Jakob ARVIDSSON Ehn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linus Frost
Player
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
Player
Jawad Belmahi
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
63%
(
17 of
27)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
89%
(
24 of
27)
49
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
20
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
96%
(
27 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
Player
Gleb Blekher
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
Player
Robert Ziganshin
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
14 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
32
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleg Khotkov
Player
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Renard
Player
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakob Arvidsson Ehn
Player
Rikard Roos
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
53
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 1-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Mansson Vs Ehn Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
