Marco Trungelliti vs Yannick Hanfmann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W L W L L
Form
L W W L L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Trungelliti 1 - 0 Hanfmann
They have played 2 sets in total, with Trungelliti winning 2 and Hanfmann winning 0. The last match between Trungelliti and Hanfmann was at the Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro, 15-02-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Marco Trungelliti getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marco Trungelliti | 1 |
| Yannick Hanfmann | 0 |
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro(15-02-2025)
6
4
6
3
| Trungelliti | Stats | Hanfmann |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (5-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (6-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 164 | Ranking | 113 |
| 112 | Highest Rank | 45 |
| 35 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 11 |
| 58% (560-398) | Career Total W/L | 58% (359-263) |
| $1,121,053 | Career Prize Money | $1,683,545 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Djokovic VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Trungelliti VS Hanfmann H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Trungelliti VS Hanfmann H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:21:7 | Average Match Time | 1:21:7 |
| 42% (26/62) | 1st Serve % | 66% (37/56) |
| 81% (21/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 47% (17/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 48% (27/56) | Return Points Win % | 39% (24/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marco Trungelliti vs Yannick Hanfmann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marco Trungelliti 1 - 0 Yannick Hanfmann
In the past six months, Trungelliti has displayed a commendable ability on their second serve, winning over 50% of the points, whereas Hanfmann has managed to surpass that with a 51.51% success rate. It is worth noting that there exists a substantial correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
An examination of return game stats reveals that Trungelliti, in recent times, has exhibited proficiency in winning 47.99% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Hanfmann has secured victory in 44.3% of such points. As for first serve returns, the numbers stand at 30.74% for Trungelliti and 25.99% for Hanfmann. It is pertinent to acknowledge that these figures possess a strong correlation in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
In terms of dealing with pressure situations, Trungelliti has demonstrated resilience by saving 60.85% of breakpoints during their recent matches. Hanfmann, on the other hand, has exhibited an even higher level of proficiency by saving 64.39% of breakpoints. This noteworthy statistic can greatly assist in making accurate predictions when engaging in in-game betting.
An overall prediction overview can be derived from the past year's performance of the players. Trungelliti has maintained an impressive 60% win-rate in their matches (42 victories and 28 losses). In comparison, Hanfmann's performance stands at 45.61% (26 victories and 31 losses) in the same time frame.
Trungelliti has excelled on the clay surface throughout their career, boasting a remarkable 61% win-rate (443 wins and 280 losses). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has been less than stellar, with a mere 38% win-rate (15 wins and 25 losses). As for Hanfmann, their accomplishments on clay have been laudable, with a 63% win-rate (211 wins and 124 losses). Conversely, their success on grass courts has been comparatively modest, with a 46% win-rate (16 wins and 19 losses).
Over the past year, Trungelliti has predominantly competed in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a minimum prize pool of $10,000. During this period, they have achieved success in 59.09% of their matches (26 victories and 18 losses). In contrast, Hanfmann has primarily participated in higher-tier events on the main tour and has managed to secure victory in 50% of their matches (16 victories and 16 losses). When assessing player statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the level of the respective events they have been competing in.
In the previous 12 months, Trungelliti has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 287.5, signifying the caliber of their competition. Hanfmann, on the other hand, has faced players with an average ranking of 122.3. These statistics shed light on the level of challenge each player has confronted leading up to this match.
For those interested in live predictions and betting, a pertinent factor to consider is the performance of players in deciding sets. Trungelliti has achieved victory in 60% of deciding sets over the course of the last 12 months, while Hanfmann boasts an impressive 75% success rate in all matches played on tour. This information can prove invaluable when making in-game predictions.
Past player performance undoubtedly holds copious value in the realm of tennis match predictions. However, once an event is underway, one must also take into account the current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Refer to the section below for updated stats on the ongoing event, should the respective players have already played a match. Furthermore, the adeptness of certain players at specific events should be reckoned with when attempting to ascertain the ultimate outcome.
Assessing recent form, Trungelliti has demonstrated a proficient ability to convert 42.77% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Hanfmann has managed to convert 36.08% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic bears particular significance when engaging in live betting, as either player having a breakpoint opportunity can be indicative of their performance.
For those wishing to delve deeper into models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. Please note that its content is tailored towards statisticians and enthusiasts well-versed in the realm of statistical analyses.
Marco Trungelliti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Marco Trungelliti
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Marco Trungelliti
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Alexander Ritschard
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Marco Trungelliti
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
47 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
111
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Marco Trungelliti
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marco Trungelliti
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Marco Trungelliti
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
115)
4
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
69%
(
25 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Juan Bautista Torres
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Mateus Alves
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Yannick Hanfmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
82%
(
63 of
77)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
60%
(
70 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
87 of
138)
9
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
60 of
138)
133
Total Points Won
121
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Manuel Guinard
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Hugo Gaston
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (560/398) | Win/Loss | 58% (359/263) |
| 55% (1261/1021) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (811/656) |
| 52% (11326/10614) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7342/6652) |
| 54% (93/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (68/65) |
| 61% (444/282) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (212/126) |
| 37% (15/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (63/53) |
| 40% (8/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (16/19) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 2522 | Aces Total | 2545 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2402 | Total Double Faults | 1220 |
| 1:17:36 | Average Match Time | 1:24:6 |
| 519.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.63 |
| 57% (30539/53349) | 1st Serve % | 64% (24071/37697) |
| 68% (20722/30539) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16865/24071) |
| 49% (11264/22810) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (7146/13626) |
| 43% (2329/5477) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1499/3752) |
| 41% (21442/52646) | Return Points Win % | 39% (15334/39426) |
| 55% (51/41) | Slam W/L | 43% (21/28) |
| 50% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 50% (20/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 80% (4/1) |
| 52% (53/48) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (97/83) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (303/233) | Challenger W/L | 58% (131/93) |
| 68% (146/69) | Futures W/L | 69% (86/38) |
| 59% (541/923) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (351/596) |
| 56% (10/18) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 16% (3/19) |
| 52% (166/321) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (89/201) |
| 61% (217/356) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (114/202) |
| 86% (498/428) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (359/302) |
| 14% (498/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (359/56) |
| 29% (460/132) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (263/56) |
See recent tennis photos of Trungelliti and Hanfmann
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
