C. Tabur
To Win
Y. Hanfmann
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
08 Jul 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
6-4 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
15%
(
3 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 0 |
25 | Games Won | 12 |
16 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
1:43:40 | Average Match Time | 1:43:40 |
68% (99/145) | 1st Serve % | 50% (63/126) |
77% (76/99) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (41/63) |
30% (14/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (26/63) |
50% (8/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 13% (2/15) |
47% (59/126) | Return Points Win % | 38% (55/145) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The upcoming match between Marco Trungelliti and Louis Tabur presents intriguing dynamics, as both players showcase strengths in different areas. Head-to-head history strongly favors Trungelliti, who has won both previous encounters without dropping a set, indicating a psychological edge.
While Tabur shows slightly better recent performance statistics, including in second serve and return games, Trungelliti’s experience on clay could become a pivotal factor, especially given his higher career win rate on this surface.
The players are evenly matched in pressure situations, but Tabur’s higher breakpoint saving makes him formidable under pressure. Nonetheless, Trungelliti’s experience with higher-ranked opponents and his superior performance in direct encounters provide a significant boost to his prospects.
In conclusion, Marco Trungelliti is favored to win this matchup, largely due to his head-to-head dominance and clay court prowess.
Trungelliti vs Tabur Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Jan Choinski
Player
Marco Trungelliti
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
64 of
120)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
11
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Matteo Martineau
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
1
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
9
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
106)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Florent Bax
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
1
Aces
7
13
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Jaime Faria
Player
Marco Trungelliti
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
6
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Colton Smith
Player
Marco Trungelliti
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
15
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
54 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Harold Mayot
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
59 of
103)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
103)
11
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Clement Tabur
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Arthur Gea
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
1
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
5
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Corentin Moutet
Player
Clement Tabur
50%
(
54 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
56%
(
31 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
82%
(
72 of
88)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (579/408) | Win/Loss | 60% (292/191) |
55% (1303/1053) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (641/462) |
52% (11686/10960) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5515/4852) |
54% (93/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (84/41) |
61% (462/290) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (176/109) |
37% (15/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (32/40) |
39% (9/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
2619 | Aces Total | 1093 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
2528 | Total Double Faults | 1100 |
1:18:54 | Average Match Time | 1:35:59 |
524.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.8 |
57% (31881/55652) | 1st Serve % | 61% (17808/29307) |
68% (21624/31881) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11944/17808) |
49% (11725/23771) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5687/11498) |
42% (2438/5748) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1479/3313) |
41% (22458/55043) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12741/29900) |
55% (52/43) | Slam W/L | 38% (3/5) |
50% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
52% (53/49) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
57% (321/240) | Challenger W/L | 50% (67/66) |
68% (146/69) | Futures W/L | 65% (222/118) |
59% (560/952) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (288/477) |
56% (10/18) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
52% (172/329) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (70/125) |
62% (229/372) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (80/141) |
86% (509/439) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (274/247) |
14% (509/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (274/27) |
29% (478/140) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (209/45) |