Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marcelo Demoliner vs Izak Van Der Merwe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Demoliner vs Merwe analysis and find out who is favored!
Marcelo Demoliner vs Izak Van Der Merwe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Demoliner has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Merwe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Demoliner, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Merwe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Demoliner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Merwe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Demoliner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Merwe winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Demoliner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 175/ 124), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Merwe has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Demoliner has played most of their matches on the Davis/Fed Cup, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Merwe has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Demoliner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Merwe has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Demoliner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Merwe has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Demoliner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Merwe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Demoliner 0 - 0 Merwe
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
40
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marcelo Demoliner | Izak Van Der Merwe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Marcelo Demoliner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats 
Elmer Moller
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
6
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Vasilenko
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Temur Ismailov
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
14
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
42 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Kristian Lozan
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Miki Jankovic
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Matej Vocel
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Lucas Gomez
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Izak Van Der Merwe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Louk Sorensen
Player
Izak van der Merwe
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Izak van der Merwe
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ze Zhang
Player
Izak van der Merwe
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Liang-Chi Huang
Player
Izak van der Merwe
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Izak van der Merwe
Player
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Player
Izak van der Merwe
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
67%
(
18 of
27)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
24
Total Points Won
20
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Izak van der Merwe
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Izak van der Merwe
Player
Ivan Endara
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Demoliner Vs Merwe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
