Prediction of Marc Silva vs Evan Zeder Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Silva vs E. Zeder

Marc Silva

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

360

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Evan Zeder

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

360

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Silva 1 - 0 Zeder

They have played 2 sets in total, with Marc Silva winning 2 and Evan Zeder winning 0. The last match between Marc Silva and Evan Zeder was at the The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign, 18-11-2002, Round: Q2, Surface: I.hard, with Marc Silva getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Silva	1
Zeder	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q2) The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign(11-18-02)

Stats

Marc Silva

Evan Zeder

M. Silva vs E. Zeder H2H Profile

M. Silva	Stats	E. Zeder
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.00% (11-11)	Career Total W/L	16.67% (1-5)
1	Indoor	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Silva vs E. Zeder Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marc Silva has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Evan Zeder has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marc Silva, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Evan Zeder has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Marc Silva has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Evan Zeder has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Marc Silva has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Evan Zeder winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Marc Silva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Evan Zeder has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 1/5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/5).
Player level: In the last year, Marc Silva has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Evan Zeder has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marc Silva winning 1 times and Evan Zeder being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Marc Silva winning 2 and Evan Zeder winning 0.
The last match between Marc Silva and Evan Zeder was at the The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign, 18-11-2002, Round: Q2, Surface: I.hard, with Marc Silva getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marc Silva has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Evan Zeder has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marc Silva has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Evan Zeder has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Marc Silva has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Evan Zeder has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Marc Silva vs Evan Zeder Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Silva vs E. Zeder H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Silva	Stats	E. Zeder
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Silva Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Atlantic City Open - Atlantic City - 09-06-2003
Q1 Juan-Ignacio CerdaJ. Cerda	W	6-4 7-6(4)	Stats
Q3 Wayne OdesnikW. Odesnik	L	6-1 3-6 6-3	Stats
Q2 Mashiska WashingtonM. Washington	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign - 18-11-2002
Q2 Evan ZederE. Zeder	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
Q3 Lukasz KubotL. Kubot	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats

View All

E. Zeder Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
USTA Illinois Challenger - Champaign - 14-11-2005
Q1 Marc SpicijaricM. Spicijaric	L	6-4 7-6(5)	Stats
The Wright Financial Group USTA Challenger - Champaign - 15-11-2004
Q1 Devin MullingsD. Mullings	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign - 17-11-2003
Q1 David MartinD. Martin	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign - 18-11-2002
Q1 Travis ParrottT. Parrott	W	2-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Q2 Marc SilvaM. Silva	L	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

M. Silva vs E. Zeder Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Silva	Stats	E. Zeder
50.00% (11/11)	YTD Win/Loss	16.67% (1/5)
50.00% (25/25)	Sets Win/Loss	15.38% (2/11)
50.52% (243/238)	Games Win/Loss	40.32% (50/74)
57.14% (8/6)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
50.00% (3/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	16.67% (1/5)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
417.32	Average Opponent Rank	244
25.00% (1/3)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
55.56% (10/8)	Challenger W/L	16.67% (1/5)
52% (11/21)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	17% (1/6)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
56% (5/9)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
60% (3/5)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
92% (12/11)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
8% (12/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (10/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (6/1)