Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marc Sieber vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sieber vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Marc Sieber vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sieber has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fatic has won 47.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sieber, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 46.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sieber has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 56.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sieber has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fatic winning 53.62% (W/L 37/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sieber has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 131/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sieber winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sieber winning 2 and Fatic winning 0. The last match between Sieber and Fatic was at the Turkey F7, 16-02-2015, Q1 round, Hard with Marc Sieber getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sieber and Fatic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sieber winning 0 times and Fatic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sieber winning 0, and Fatic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sieber has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 273.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sieber has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sieber has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 40.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sieber 1 - 0 Fatic
Ret.
Rank
236
High
36
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
63% (429-249)
Career Total W/L
57% (339-252)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$660
Career Prize Money
$73,995
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marc Sieber | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marc Sieber | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (15/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (150/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 343.87 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (574/926) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (393/574) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (167/352) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (27/81) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (360/982) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Marc Sieber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Marc Sieber
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Sieber
Player
Robin Kern
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Albano Olivetti
Player
Marc Sieber
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
36
Aces
10
10
Double Faults
1
94%
(
50 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
19 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Marc Sieber
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Sieber
Player
Max Wiskandt
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
94%
(
15 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Marc Sieber
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Marc Sieber
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
13
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Zeballos
Player
Marc Sieber
49%
(
49 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Sieber Vs Fatic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
