Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Polmans Ilkel H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Polmans Ilkel head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Polmans Vs Ilkel Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Polmans was 2016 when he won 74% of matches played on all surfaces (63/22). Ilkel was in the best form in 2017 when he had victories of 63% of his matches (57/34). In their last event played, Ilkel made the First round at Yokohama Challenger, whereas Polmans played Yokohama Challenger and made the Second round.
162
Rank
116
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
252
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
56% (317-248)
Career Total W/L
57% (392-299)
59% (50-35)
YTD W/L
53% (33-29)
$574,470
Career Prize Money
$225,530
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marc Polmans | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 25 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:33 | 1:17:33 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (59/100) | 57% (65/114) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (46/59) | 55% (36/65) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (24/41) | 45% (22/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (9/19) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (56/114) | 30% (30/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Marc Polmans
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
| 6-3 1-6 6-1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Cem Ilkel
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marc Polmans | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (50/35) | 53% (33/29) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (113/81) | 50% (71/71) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (974/895) | 50% (686/677) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (32/23) | 38% (6/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 66% (27/14) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 370 | 277 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 239 | 149 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:15 | 1:42:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 305.16 | 304.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (3810/5728) | 58% (2439/4237) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (2613/3810) | 72% (1756/2439) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (951/1918) | 51% (918/1798) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (235/554) | 42% (153/364) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (2260/5735) | 38% (1615/4300) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (31/28) | 54% (26/22) |
| Futures W/L | 90% (9/1) | 80% (4/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (49/82) | 53% (33/62) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 61% (14/23) | 50% (11/22) |
| Deciding Set W% | 48% (12/25) | 72% (13/18) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (54/45) | 93% (28/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (54/9) | 7% (28/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (31/6) | 21% (34/7) |
Marc Polmans Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Marc Polmans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Giovanni Fonio
77%
(
67 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
25 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Moez Echargui
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Rio Noguchi
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Marc Polmans
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Marc Polmans
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Andrew Fenty
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
5
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Marc Polmans
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Cem Ilkel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Cem Ilkel
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Max Purcell
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
11
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
5
Aces
18
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
65%
(
33 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Cem Ilkel
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Laaksonen
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Cem Ilkel
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Polmans Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
