M. S. (RUS)
To Win
I. Biletic
To Win
Marat Sharipov (RUS) vs Mats Rosenkranz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L W LHead-2-Head: (RUS) 1 - 0 Rosenkranz
They have played 3 sets in total, with (RUS) winning 2 and Rosenkranz winning 1. The last match between (RUS) and Rosenkranz was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 29-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Marat Sharipov (RUS) getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marat Sharipov (RUS) | 1 |
| Mats Rosenkranz | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Guangzhou Challenger(29-04-2025)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Mats Rosenkranz
6
3
3
6
6
4
| (RUS) | Stats | Rosenkranz |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (28-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (20-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 256 | Ranking | 365 |
| 243 | Highest Rank | 336 |
| 22 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 0 | Titles | 8 |
| 67% (170-85) | Career Total W/L | 51% (303-287) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $4,755 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
11 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Birrell VS Yuan PREDICTION Grass
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch wta
11 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Perricard VS Aliassime PREDICTION Grass
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
11 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
(RUS) VS Rosenkranz H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
14
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
(RUS) VS Rosenkranz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:47:27 | Average Match Time | 1:47:27 |
| 55% (43/78) | 1st Serve % | 47% (42/90) |
| 77% (33/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (30/42) |
| 51% (18/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (24/48) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 40% (36/90) | Return Points Win % | 35% (27/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
(RUS) vs Rosenkranz Match Preview :
In recent months, data reveals that Rosenkranz has displayed a superior performance on their second serve, winning 49.07% of points, compared to (RUS), who has secured 46.18% in the same category. This particular metric is often closely tied to predicting match outcomes.
When examining return game statistics, (RUS) has won 47.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rosenkranz follows closely with a 45.26% success rate. In terms of returning first serves, (RUS) leads with a 22.12% win rate, compared to Rosenkranz's 19.95%. These figures are significant when evaluating head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, (RUS) shows proficiency by saving 58.39% of breakpoints, whereas Rosenkranz has saved 56.62%. Breakpoint conversion rates tell another side of the story, with (RUS) converting 31.79% of opportunities and Rosenkranz at 29.58%, providing insight into potential in-game developments.
Looking at past performance, over the past year, Rosenkranz has achieved a win rate of 66.22%, with 49 wins and 25 losses. Conversely, (RUS) has not won any matches, marking a win-loss record of 0/0. The quality of past opponents indicates that Rosenkranz has faced competitors with an average ranking of 411.03.
In deciding sets, Rosenkranz holds a significant advantage, claiming victory in 62% of such sets, whereas (RUS) has not won any deciding set in the last 12 months. This ability to perform in crucial sets can be critical for determining match predictions and betting strategies.
In summary, based on the statistical analysis, Rosenkranz exhibits a higher level of performance across several key areas. Given these metrics, it is predicted that Rosenkranz will emerge as the victor in the upcoming match.
(RUS) vs Rosenkranz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Marat Sharipov (RUS) Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Lucas Poullain
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
11
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Maxence Beauge
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Maxence Rivet
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Yanaki Milev
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Mats Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Pawel Juszczak
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
14
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
15
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
6
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
41 of
49)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
20 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (170/85) | Win/Loss | 51% (303/287) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (685/679) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6734/6567) |
| 75% (87/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (58/73) |
| 60% (63/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (109/112) |
| 59% (20/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (127/96) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.59 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 3803 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1886 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:23:59 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.55 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 60% (20849/34688) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (15537/20849) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6641/13839) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1131/2942) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 37% (12966/35284) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 61% (23/15) | Challenger W/L | 46% (73/85) |
| 68% (147/69) | Futures W/L | 54% (229/197) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (296/580) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (111/222) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (106/191) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (294/248) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (294/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (295/54) |
(RUS) vs. Rosenkranz Prediction Form Trend:
-Mats-Rosenkranz-h2h-seo-profile.webp "Marat Sharipov (RUS) vs Mats Rosenkranz Form Prediction")
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
