Marat Sharipov (RUS) vs Hayden Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W W L L LHead To Head: (RUS) 1 - 0 Jones
They have played 3 sets in total, with (RUS) winning 2 and Jones winning 1. The last match between (RUS) and Jones was at the Gwangju Challenger, 20-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Marat Sharipov (RUS) getting the victory 6-1 6-7(6) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marat Sharipov (RUS) | 1 |
| Hayden Jones | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(20-04-2025)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Hayden Jones
6
1
6
7
6
3
| (RUS) | Stats | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (25-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 20% (3-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 245 | Ranking | N/A |
| 245 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 22 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 67% (167-83) | Career Total W/L | 33% (18-37) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Reales VS Wang PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Agut PREDICTION Clay
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Hayden Jones
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
16
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
98
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 11 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:57:33 | Average Match Time | 1:57:33 |
| 57% (51/90) | 1st Serve % | 60% (49/81) |
| 80% (41/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (27/49) |
| 51% (20/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 46% (37/81) | Return Points Win % | 32% (29/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marat Sharipov (RUS) Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Yanaki Milev
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
14
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
78%
(
21 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Andre Ilagan
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
12
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Hayden Jones
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
16
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
98
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
44%
(
30 of
68)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hayden Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Hayden Jones
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
36%
(
22 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Hayden Jones
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
16
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
98
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Hayden Jones
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hayden Jones
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hayden Jones
Player
Kuan-Shou Chen
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Hayden Jones
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Hayden Jones
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Artur Kukasian
Player
Hayden Jones
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (167/83) | Win/Loss | 33% (18/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 37% (49/84) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (587/697) |
| 75% (87/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 36% (16/29) |
| 60% (60/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
| 59% (20/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 180 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 171 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:46:4 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.22 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2462/3929) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1624/2462) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (731/1467) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (104/270) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 34% (1241/3654) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (23/14) | Challenger W/L | 14% (2/12) |
| 68% (144/68) | Futures W/L | 41% (16/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (18/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (11/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 63% (19/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 37% (19/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (36/6) |
(RUS) vs. Jones Prediction Form Trend:
-Hayden-Jones-h2h-seo-profile.webp "Marat Sharipov (RUS) vs Hayden Jones Form Prediction")
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
