Mara Schmidt vs Lauren Marker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmidt vs Marker analysis and find out who is favored!
Mara Schmidt vs Lauren Marker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmidt has won 36.55% of points on his second serve, while Marker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmidt, in recent form, has won 55.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmidt has saved 47.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmidt has won 30% of matches played (W/L 3/ 7), with Marker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmidt has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 33/ 53). Marker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4), where as Marker has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schmidt winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schmidt winning 0 and Marker winning 2. The last match between Schmidt and Marker was at the Petit Bourg, 15-01-2018, First, Hard with Lauren Marker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schmidt and Marker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schmidt winning 0 times and Marker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schmidt winning 0, and Marker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmidt has played against opponents with an average rank of 20 while Marker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmidt has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmidt has converted 53.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schmidt 0 - 1 Marker
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
895
Rank
724
High
32
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
792
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
41% (68-96)
Career Total W/L
54% (25-21)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mara Schmidt | Lauren Marker |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 5 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
1st Serve % | 54% (29/54) | 55% (29/53) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (19/29) | 48% (14/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 24% (6/25) | 83% (20/24) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 71% (5/7) |
Return Points W% | 36% (19/53) | 54% (29/54) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
Lauren Marker
Player
Mara Schmidt
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mara Schmidt | Lauren Marker |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (48/47) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
Aces Total | 10 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
DFs Total | 13 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (125/221) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (79/125) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (39/96) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 55% (11/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (84/193) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mara Schmidt Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Isabella Marton
Player
Mara Schmidt
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mara Schmidt
Player
Unknown Player
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
2 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gabriella Vannessa Lindgren
Player
Mara Schmidt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Meisha Kendall-Woseley
Player
Mara Schmidt
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
48%
(
21 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Lilian Poling
Player
Mara Schmidt
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 2-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Martina Okalova
Player
Mara Schmidt
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Francesca Di Lorenzo
Player
Mara Schmidt
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Lauren Marker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Tamaryn Hendler
Player
Lauren Marker
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lauren Marker
Player
Sophia Hatton
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Madeleine Kobelt
Player
Lauren Marker
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lauren Marker
Player
Ching-Wen Hsu
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Helene Scholsen
Player
Lauren Marker
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Naomi Broady
Player
Lauren Marker
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more