F. Marozsan
To Win
L. Nardi
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W W LForm
L W L W W L W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Dhamne winning 0 and Nardi winning 2. The last match between Dhamne and Nardi was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 21-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Luca Nardi getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Manas Manoj Dhamne | 0 |
Luca Nardi | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(21-04-2025)
Dhamne | Stats | Nardi |
---|---|---|
70% (33-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (20-17) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
756 | Ranking | 94 |
754 | Highest Rank | 67 |
17 | Age | 21 |
- | Plays | - |
1 | Titles | 10 |
59% (75-52) | Career Total W/L | 56% (172-137) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $452,995 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Nardi
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
8 | Games Won | 12 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:15:43 | Average Match Time | 1:15:43 |
61% (34/56) | 1st Serve % | 63% (34/54) |
74% (25/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (27/34) |
50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
28% (15/54) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20/56) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the current form, Nardi shows a slightly better performance in second serve points, securing 45.61% compared to Dhamne’s 44.13%. Such metrics have substantial relevance in predicting match outcomes. However, return game statistics shift the scale towards Dhamne, who has recently won 48.36% of opponents' second serve points, exceeding Nardi's 44.81%. Additionally, Dhamne demonstrates superiority in the first serve returns, achieving 34.46% as opposed to Nardi’s 24.14%. These indicators provide a strong signal in forecasting the likely winner in head-to-head encounters.
In situations with high pressure, Nardi has a marginal advantage, successfully saving 54.14% of breakpoints over recent matches, compared to Dhamne’s 47.27%. This statistic is particularly valuable for in-play betting strategies. The performance overview over the past year illustrates Dhamne’s dominance, with a 65.33% win rate compared to Nardi's 50%. This gives a clear perspective on their match-up prospects.
When evaluating their preferred surfaces, both players excel on Hard courts. Nardi has secured a 59% win rate, slightly below Dhamne’s 62%. Conversely, while Grass appears to be Nardi’s least favorable surface with a 29% win rate, Dhamne’s weakest performance occurs on Clay, where he still maintains a 58% success rate.
Nardi often competes at the Challengers/ITF events greater than $10K level, securing victories in 66.67% of matches, whereas Dhamne stalwarts in the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits with a win rate of 67.61%. Their match experiences are further highlighted by the caliber of their opponents, as Nardi plays adversaries with an average rank of 239.45, contrasting Dhamne's tougher competition averaging a rank of 164.11.
In the deciding set scenarios, Dhamne holds a significant edge, clinching 67% of such sets compared to Nardi’s 47% over the past year. Moreover, in terms of break point conversion, Dhamne converts 39.77% of opportunities, clearly outperforming Nardi’s 30.15%. These statistics can provide insightful tips for live betting, particularly during breakpoint opportunities.
Taking all these factors into account, the prediction shifts in favor of Dhamne. Based on surface performance, match-winning statistics, and higher ranking opponents faced, Dhamne seems poised to seize victory in their imminent match-up.
Dhamne vs Nardi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Cachin
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Martin Krumich
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Andrej Martin
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Justin Schlageter
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
81 of
121)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
121)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Alexander Weis
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
74%
(
17 of
23)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
21
Total Points Won
16
|
3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Marco Cecchinato
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luca Nardi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Nardi
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
87 of
119)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
49 of
87)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alex De Minaur
Player
Luca Nardi
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Nardi
Player
Flavio Cobolli
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Michelsen
Player
Luca Nardi
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Nardi
Player
Alexey Vatutin
49%
(
38 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Nardi
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hugo Gaston
Player
Luca Nardi
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (75/52) | Win/Loss | 56% (172/137) |
57% (161/122) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (394/342) |
54% (1404/1219) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3660/3463) |
62% (41/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (57/39) |
56% (34/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (64/53) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (49/40) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
53 | Aces Total | 962 |
0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
185 | Total Double Faults | 853 |
1:12:18 | Average Match Time | 1:43:58 |
349.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 338.54 |
69% (3833/5565) | 1st Serve % | 63% (14010/22384) |
60% (2288/3833) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (9641/14010) |
48% (834/1732) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4243/8375) |
44% (270/609) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (914/2247) |
42% (2364/5583) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8929/22754) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 27% (4/11) |
0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 42% (11/15) |
0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (20/28) |
36% (4/7) | Challenger W/L | 60% (100/67) |
62% (71/43) | Futures W/L | 70% (37/16) |
60% (74/124) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (168/298) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 13% (1/8) |
54% (15/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (52/113) |
66% (21/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (61/110) |
94% (69/65) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (164/136) |
6% (69/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (164/28) |
19% (58/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (145/36) |