K. Juvan
To Win
K. Okamura
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W W L L W LForm
L L L W W L L W W LThey have played 9 sets in total, with Sawangkaew winning 6 and Okamura winning 3. The last match between Sawangkaew and Okamura was at the W100 Gifu, 30-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Mananchaya Sawangkaew getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Mananchaya Sawangkaew | 3 |
Kyoka Okamura | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W100 Gifu(30-04-2025)
Sawangkaew | Stats | Okamura |
---|---|---|
56% (19-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (9-17) |
3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
104 | Ranking | 182 |
100 | Highest Rank | 178 |
22 | Age | 29 |
- | Plays | - |
3 | Titles | 3 |
65% (189-100) | Career Total W/L | 54% (362-312) |
$154,590 | Career Prize Money | $75,106 |
3 | Hard H2H | 1 |
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Kyoka Okamura
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Kyoka Okamura
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Kyoka Okamura
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
6-3 7-6(0) |
![]() ![]()
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
6 | Sets Won | 3 |
51 | Games Won | 30 |
9 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
12 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
1:35:3 | Average Match Time | 1:35:3 |
67% (181/270) | 1st Serve % | 62% (159/256) |
66% (119/181) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (90/159) |
56% (50/89) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (44/97) |
40% (18/45) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (8/21) |
48% (122/256) | Return Points Win % | 37% (101/270) |
75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When it comes to second-serve performance over the past six months, we have Okamura securing 38.36% of points on their second serve, while Sawangkaew trails slightly with a rate of 36.76%. Could this slim margin shape the narrative of their impending clash? Historically, a strong second-serve performance bodes well for match predictions, so it will be fascinating to see how this plays out on the court.
Taking a closer look at return game statistics, Okamura has demonstrated prowess by clinching 52.53% of points on their opponent's second serve. In comparison, Sawangkaew captures 51.55% of these points. The battle is similarly tight on first-serve returns, where Okamura claims 35.54%, edging Sawangkaew's 33.45%. Given the close nature of these figures, how much influence will return performance have on today's outcome?
Pressure is often a litmus test for champions. With this in mind, it's crucial to note Okamura has managed to save 47.19% of breakpoints, whereas Sawangkaew sits at 44.93%. During critical moments, could these statistics foreshadow who will maintain composure under duress? Moreover, in their career bests, Okamura shines on grass with a 64% win rate, contrasted by a challenging 46% on clay. Meanwhile, Sawangkaew thrives on hard courts with a 66% success rate, yet falters on grass with no wins. How will these surface preferences impact their confrontation?
Evaluating recent performance, Okamura boasts a 58.02% match-win rate over the past year (47 wins to 34 losses). Sawangkaew, however, edges slightly ahead with a 60.26% success rate (47 wins to 31 losses). With both primarily competing in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, their experience levels should provide an intriguing backdrop for today's duel.
Their head-to-head history adds another layer of intrigue. They have faced off thrice, with Okamura claiming a single win, and Sawangkaew emerging victorious twice. Set-wise, Sawangkaew has the upper hand with 4 wins to Okamura's 3. It's noteworthy that the last encounter saw Sawangkaew triumphing at W75 Burnie, might this give them a psychological edge? However, in extreme pressure scenarios, Okamura boasts two tiebreak wins to Sawangkaew's zero – could this play a role if they face a similar situation again?
Finally, ranking of opponents provides insight into the depth of competition each has faced, with Okamura playing against an average rank of 363.23, while Sawangkaew's adversaries have averaged 244.78. Intriguingly, if today's match stretches into a deciding set, both have demonstrated resilience – Okamura winning 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, compared to Sawangkaew's 63%. In these tight match-ups, break point conversion could prove decisive; Sawangkaew edges out Okamura here, converting 47.17% of break opportunities compared to Okamura's 39.44%.
Considering these statistics and the intense head-to-head battles they've shared, the scales tip ever so slightly in Sawangkaew’s favor. With compelling numbers on returns and breakpoint conversion, Sawangkaew might just possess the edge needed to seal the day. Whether the numbers will hold under the spotlight remains to be seen, but brace yourselves for a thrilling tennis showdown!
Sawangkaew vs Okamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Lizette Cabrera
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
7
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
54%
(
49 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Shuai Zhang
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Heather Watson
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Ena Koike
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
76 of
117)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
117)
124
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Kyoka Okamura
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Kyoka Okamura
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
128)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
128)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Vitalia Diatchenko
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Tereza Martincova
Player
Kyoka Okamura
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
66%
(
73 of
110)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Kyoka Okamura
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65% (189/100) | Win/Loss | 54% (362/312) |
62% (418/255) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (830/736) |
55% (3354/2756) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (7316/7000) |
67% (178/89) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (269/231) |
40% (2/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (25/31) |
60% (9/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (50/39) |
0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 62% (18/11) |
0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
712 | Aces Total | 677 |
0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
1135 | Total Double Faults | 1590 |
1:29:28 | Average Match Time | 1:19:50 |
410.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 540.8 |
61% (11050/18005) | 1st Serve % | 63% (20814/33143) |
65% (7137/11050) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (12612/20814) |
45% (3160/6955) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5618/12327) |
51% (1212/2398) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1928/4085) |
48% (8799/18414) | Return Points Win % | 45% (15119/33668) |
50% (4/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/4) |
50% (3/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
56% (5/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
68% (15/7) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (12/18) |
65% (127/67) | Challenger W/L | 53% (292/254) |
70% (35/15) | Futures W/L | 62% (58/36) |
66% (185/282) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (358/669) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
63% (38/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (57/124) |
57% (55/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (111/219) |
86% (182/157) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (362/305) |
13% (182/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (362/57) |
29% (107/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (312/56) |