Malene Helgo vs Chiara Grimm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Helgo vs Grimm analysis and find out who is favored!
Malene Helgo vs Chiara Grimm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Helgo has won 49.63% of points on his second serve, while Grimm has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Helgo, in recent form, has won 56.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Grimm has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.17% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Helgo has saved 58.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Grimm has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Helgo has won 64.91% of matches played (W/L 37/ 20), with Grimm winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Helgo has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 45/ 27), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 29/ 25). Grimm has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 12/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Helgo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.1% of matches (W/L 25/ 14), where as Grimm has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Helgo has played against opponents with an average rank of 231.18 while Grimm has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Helgo has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Grimm has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Helgo has converted 45.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Grimm has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Helgo 0 - 0 Grimm
9
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
444
Rank
317
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
539
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (202-129)
Career Total W/L
56% (102-81)
80% (24-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Malene Helgo | Chiara Grimm |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 80% (24/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 72% (50/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 58% (376/276) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 76% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 85% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
Aces Total | 66 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
DFs Total | 79 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:16 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 167.33 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (1233/2033) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (836/1233) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (400/800) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (120/263) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (936/2061) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 82% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 100% (10/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (24/30) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (19/19) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (19/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 45% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Malene Helgo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
Malene Helgo
Player
Julie Belgraver
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
Malene Helgo
Player
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Malene Helgo
Player
Talia Neilson Gatenby
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Malene Helgo
Player
Boyoung Jeong
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Malene Helgo
Player
Yujin Ahn
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Malene Helgo
Player
Marie Weckerle
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Malene Helgo
Player
Jana Hossam Salah
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
48 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Malene Helgo
Player
Kseniya Yersh
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Malene Helgo
Player
Ayline Esina Samardzic
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
39%
(
22 of
57)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Malene Helgo
Player
Andrea Roots
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Chiara Grimm Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Teliana Pereira
Player
Chiara Grimm
86%
(
62 of
72)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eleonora Molinaro
Player
Chiara Grimm
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chiara Grimm
Player
Julia Lohoff
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Chiara Grimm
Player
Sinja Kraus
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ivana Popovic
Player
Chiara Grimm
53%
(
46 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Anita Wagner
Player
Chiara Grimm
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more