Maja Radenkovic vs Anastasia Piangerelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Radenkovic vs Piangerelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Maja Radenkovic vs Anastasia Piangerelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Radenkovic has won 38.46% of points on his second serve, while Piangerelli has won 40.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Radenkovic, in recent form, has won 63.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Piangerelli has won 60.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.55% and 40.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Radenkovic has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Piangerelli has saved 45.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Radenkovic has won 45.16% of matches played (W/L 14/ 17), with Piangerelli winning 55.56% (W/L 20/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Radenkovic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 21/ 29). Piangerelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 64/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Radenkovic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12), where as Piangerelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Radenkovic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Radenkovic winning 2 and Piangerelli winning 0. The last match between Radenkovic and Piangerelli was at the W15 Heraklion, 17-05-2022, Q3, Clay with Maja Radenkovic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Radenkovic and Piangerelli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Radenkovic winning 0 times and Piangerelli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Radenkovic winning 1, and Piangerelli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Radenkovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 47.71 while Piangerelli has played against players with an average rank of 116.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Radenkovic has won 22% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Piangerelli has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Radenkovic has converted 58.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Piangerelli has converted 52.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Radenkovic 1 - 0 Piangerelli
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
875
Rank
868
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
47% (59-67)
Career Total W/L
50% (85-85)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Radenkovic VS Piangerelli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Maja Radenkovic | Anastasia Piangerelli |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Radenkovic VS Piangerelli H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Maja Radenkovic | Anastasia Piangerelli |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 40% (2/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 42% (5/7) |
Games Win/Loss | 44% (44/55) | 46% (42/49) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.02 |
Aces Total | 8 | 1 |
DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.3 |
DFs Total | 5 | 13 |
Avg Match Time | 2:2:45 | 1:21:48 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (196/300) | 70% (191/273) |
1st Serve W% | 56% (110/196) | 53% (101/191) |
2nd Serve W% | 38% (40/104) | 40% (33/82) |
BPs Won% Total | 58% (18/31) | 50% (19/38) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (139/291) | 46% (128/278) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 40% (2/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 33% (3/1) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 67% (3/2) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Maja Radenkovic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
Player
Maja Radenkovic
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
24%
(
6 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
57%
(
48 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-6(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lara Schmidt
Player
Maja Radenkovic
82%
(
62 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maja Radenkovic
Player
Aminata Sall
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jana Hossam Salah
Player
Maja Radenkovic
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
73 of
100)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Maja Radenkovic
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Enola Chiesa
Player
Maja Radenkovic
67%
(
78 of
117)
1st Serve %
60%
(
76 of
126)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
46%
(
54 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
67 of
126)
130
Total Points Won
113
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maja Radenkovic
Player
Anastasija Arsic
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
73)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maja Radenkovic
Player
Isabelle Cherny
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daria Kuczer
Player
Maja Radenkovic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Natalija Senic
Player
Maja Radenkovic
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Anastasia Piangerelli Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Vlada Mincheva
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
0-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Melis Ayda Uyar
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lisa Pigato
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Karina Hofbauer
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maria Bondarenko
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Natalia Siedliska
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Aruzhan Sagandikova
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H |
view more