E. Jacquemot
To Win
K. Boulter
To Win
Maja Chwalinska vs Elsa Jacquemot Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L L L W L
Form
W L W W L W L W W WHead-To-Head: Chwalinska 1 - 0 Jacquemot
They have played 3 sets in total, with Chwalinska winning 2 and Jacquemot winning 1. The last match between Chwalinska and Jacquemot was at the Megasaray Hotels Open 1 - Antalya, 21-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Maja Chwalinska getting the victory 6-0 6-7(7) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maja Chwalinska | 1 |
| Elsa Jacquemot | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Megasaray Hotels Open 1 - Antalya(21-03-2025)
Maja Chwalinska
Elsa Jacquemot
6
0
6
7
7
5
| Chwalinska | Stats | Jacquemot |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (9-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (23-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 124 | Ranking | 140 |
| 121 | Highest Rank | 137 |
| 23 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 2 |
| 66% (228-120) | Career Total W/L | 53% (177-156) |
| $342,835 | Career Prize Money | $285,203 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zheng VS Gauff PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
15 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
15 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Chwalinska VS Jacquemot H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-7(7) 7-5 |
Stats 
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
77 of
119)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
62 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Chwalinska VS Jacquemot H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 3:20:48 | Average Match Time | 3:20:48 |
| 76% (77/101) | 1st Serve % | 65% (77/119) |
| 60% (46/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (45/77) |
| 50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (12/42) |
| 35% (8/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 52% (62/119) | Return Points Win % | 43% (43/101) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chwalinska vs Jacquemot Match Preview :
Which player holds the advantage when it comes to second serve retention? In the past six months, Jacquemot has clinched 40.61% of points on their second serve. Meanwhile, Chwalinska edges ahead slightly with 41.83%. This slight difference can play a crucial role in gauging who can hold their fragile serve under pressure.
But how do these players fare in return games? A deep dive into their performance over the same period reveals that Jacquemot is a bit more aggressive, snatching 52.27% of points from her opponent's second serve. On the other side, Chwalinska claims 48.67%. When facing their opponent's first serve, it's Chwalinska who shines brighter, winning 36.3% against Jacquemot's 28.93%. This interplay of return stats suggests a match where serves will be heavily challenged.
When the pressure mounts, who stands stronger? Jacquemot has shown more resilience, saving 45.65% of breakpoints, slightly outpacing Chwalinska's 44.92%. This statistic is particularly appealing for those with an interest in live betting.
Let's glance over their past year's performance to understand who could hold the upper hand. Jacquemot's win record stands at 54.43% (W/L 43/36), while Chwalinska boasts a more impressive 70.97% (W/L 44/18). This differential might hint at Chwalinska seizing the upper hand in our head-to-head prediction.
Surface preferences can be telling of a player's prowess. For Jacquemot, indoor hard courts prove favorable, wielding a 58% success rate (W/L 71/52). Grass, however, does not suit her style as well, with a mere 46% return (W/L 6/7). Conversely, Chwalinska dominates on clay with a formidable 71% (W/L 132/53), although indoor hard courts show her more vulnerable side at 56% (W/L 32/25).
Evaluating the level of competition they've faced, Jacquemot has gone up against an average rank of 195.48, in contrast to Chwalinska's opponents averaging 255.1. This difference indicates a tougher journey for Jacquemot, which can build resilience and skill.
In scenarios forcing a deciding set, Chwalinska seems poised for victory with a 67% win rate, compared to Jacquemot's more modest 46%. Such stats are vital for those predicting the match's outcome if it goes down to the wire.
Regarding breaking their opponent's serve during recent matches, Chwalinska once again edges ahead, converting 42.38% of break points, compared to Jacquemot's 33.92%. This decisive stat could be pivotal in swinging the match in favor of one player.
Taking all these statistics into account, Chwalinska appears to hold the advantage in this matchup with her stronger historical performance, superior break point conversion, and potent clay court prowess.
Chwalinska vs Jacquemot Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maja Chwalinska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Maja Chwalinska
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
118)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
62 of
118)
124
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Maja Chwalinska
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Maja Chwalinska
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Maja Chwalinska
115%
(
61 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
40 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Maja Chwalinska
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
47 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Maja Chwalinska
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Maja Chwalinska
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
94)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Elsa Jacquemot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Sonay Kartal
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
34
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Yue Yuan
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
23%
(
7 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Sara Bejlek
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
82%
(
50 of
61)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Olivia Gadecki
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Marina Stakusic
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
81 of
121)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
46 of
81)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (228/120) | Win/Loss | 53% (177/156) |
| 63% (494/290) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (417/364) |
| 56% (3900/3094) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3774/3564) |
| 64% (39/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (30/27) |
| 69% (134/60) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (70/69) |
| 59% (48/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (71/53) |
| 58% (7/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 172 | Aces Total | 1430 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.5 |
| 723 | Total Double Faults | 1789 |
| 1:40:48 | Average Match Time | 1:47:44 |
| 448.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 270.02 |
| 70% (15205/21572) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14140/24079) |
| 58% (8889/15205) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9314/14140) |
| 49% (3111/6367) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (4130/9939) |
| 49% (1526/3093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1411/3014) |
| 49% (10767/22106) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11115/24467) |
| 47% (9/10) | Slam W/L | 38% (10/16) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (6/6) | Main Tour W/L | 32% (8/17) |
| 68% (200/96) | Challenger W/L | 57% (150/112) |
| 71% (12/5) | Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 66% (223/338) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (173/329) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (36/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (39/79) |
| 57% (51/90) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (52/120) |
| 88% (226/198) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (182/144) |
| 12% (226/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (182/38) |
| 24% (122/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (150/32) |
Chwalinska vs. Jacquemot Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
