Mai Hontama vs Maddison Inglis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W L L L
Form
W L L L W L L W W LHead-2-Head: Hontama 2 - 0 Inglis
They have played 4 sets in total, with Hontama winning 4 and Inglis winning 0. The last match between Hontama and Inglis was at the W100 Gifu, 30-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Mai Hontama getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mai Hontama | 2 |
| Maddison Inglis | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W100 Gifu(30-04-2025)
Mai Hontama
Maddison Inglis
6
1
6
4
| Hontama | Stats | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (13-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (20-14) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 192 | Ranking | 152 |
| 105 | Highest Rank | 112 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 9 |
| 59% (279-194) | Career Total W/L | 59% (298-203) |
| $575,073 | Career Prize Money | $518,100 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Michelsen PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Humbert VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Mai Hontama
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Maddison Inglis
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:12:11 | Average Match Time | 1:12:11 |
| 60% (63/105) | 1st Serve % | 52% (48/93) |
| 68% (43/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (23/48) |
| 60% (25/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (17/45) |
| 59% (10/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 57% (53/93) | Return Points Win % | 35% (37/105) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hontama vs Inglis Match Preview :
Analyzing the recent performance of Inglis and Hontama, we see distinct variations in their second serve success rates. Inglis has captured 41.79% of points on their second serve in the last six months, while Hontama has managed a slightly lower figure of 39.86%. This statistic is often a strong indicator of match outcomes, offering insights into likely success for either player.
When considering return games, Hontama has demonstrated a stronger performance in recent form, capturing 50.89% of points on the opponent's second serve, compared to Inglis' 46.5%. For first serve returns, Hontama's success rate stands at 33.94%, exceeding Inglis' 30.07%. This data holds significant weight in determining the likely victor in their head-to-head clashes.
Assessing performances under pressure highlights Inglis' ability to save 49.23% of breakpoints, showing superior resilience compared to Hontama’s 42.42%. When it comes to converting break points, Hontama leads with a 38.97% conversion rate versus Inglis’ 33.33%, a critical stat for predicting game shifts during play.
Over the past year, Inglis has a win-loss record of 47-27, translating to a win percentage of 63.51%. In contrast, Hontama has won 42.37% of her matches, with a record of 25-34. These figures provide a broad perspective on their relative dominance over the past twelve months.
Surface performance analysis reveals that both players favor hard courts. Inglis boasts a career win rate of 62% on this surface, closely matched by Hontama's 61%. However, their weakest surfaces diverge, with Inglis struggling on indoor hard (0%), and Hontama being less successful on grass (50%).
In the realm of competitive environments, Inglis has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, enjoying a higher win rate of 66.67%. Hontama, involved in similar level tournaments, holds a win rate of 42.42%. These statistics underline Inglis' stronger performance at these event levels.
Their head-to-head history features a single encounter, which Hontama won convincingly, 6-2, 6-1 at the W 50 Corroios-Seixal on a hard court. This match also averaged a duration of 1 hour and 8 minutes, offering some context for expectations around match length.
Opponent quality further differentiates these players: Inglis' recent opponents have had an average ranking of 281.2, whereas Hontama's competitors have been ranked higher, for an average of 250.15. This suggests that Hontama has been facing tougher competition.
In deciding sets against all players, both Inglis and Hontama have an identical success rate of 45% over the last year. This information is crucial for live predictions, particularly in close matches that extend to a deciding set.
Based on these statistics, Inglis appears to have a slight edge in overall match and event performance. Therefore, despite past head-to-head outcomes, Inglis could be considered the favorite to win the upcoming matchup, given her recent form and tournament success. The weight of these various statistics suggests a promising prospect for Inglis in their forthcoming contest.
Hontama vs Inglis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mai Hontama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Mai Hontama
45%
(
31 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Mai Hontama
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Mai Hontama
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
73 of
100)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
52%
(
50 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
54 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Elena Pridankina
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Mai Hontama
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
43 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Renata Jamrichova
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Tereza Martincova
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
85%
(
58 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Maddison Inglis
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
12
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
6
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Priscilla Hon
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Maddison Inglis
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Maddison Inglis
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (279/194) | Win/Loss | 59% (298/203) |
| 57% (618/457) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (668/481) |
| 53% (5191/4513) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5559/4866) |
| 61% (208/135) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (237/148) |
| 54% (28/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (22/25) |
| 56% (36/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 50% (7/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (35/23) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 181 | Aces Total | 779 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1346 | Total Double Faults | 1347 |
| 1:31:35 | Average Match Time | 1:28:9 |
| 413.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.41 |
| 67% (19266/28641) | 1st Serve % | 65% (18544/28394) |
| 59% (11273/19266) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11636/18544) |
| 46% (4269/9361) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4595/9850) |
| 50% (2000/4017) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1704/3560) |
| 48% (14133/29179) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13235/29392) |
| 50% (15/15) | Slam W/L | 45% (17/21) |
| 50% (9/9) | Masters W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 80% (8/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (28/29) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (20/28) |
| 60% (191/127) | Challenger W/L | 64% (251/144) |
| 70% (28/12) | Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) |
| 59% (277/466) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (294/490) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 49% (43/87) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (62/96) |
| 54% (73/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (80/154) |
| 88% (269/236) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (295/252) |
| 12% (269/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (295/43) |
| 21% (204/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (206/46) |
Hontama vs. Inglis Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
