Madison Brengle vs Emma Navarro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brengle vs Navarro analysis and find out who is favored!
Madison Brengle vs Emma Navarro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brengle has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Navarro has won 48.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brengle, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Navarro has won 58.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brengle has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Navarro has saved 56.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brengle has won 50% of matches played (W/L 14/ 14), with Navarro winning 72.83% (W/L 67/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brengle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 340/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 45/ 45). Navarro has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43).
- Player level: In the last year, Brengle has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 11/ 7), where as Navarro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 81.82% of matches (W/L 27/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Brengle winning 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Brengle winning 2 and Navarro winning 6. The last match between Brengle and Navarro was at the W100 Charleston, 22-04-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Emma Navarro getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brengle and Navarro have played a deciding set 1 times, with Brengle winning 0 times and Navarro 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Brengle winning 1, and Navarro 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brengle has played against opponents with an average rank of 150.5 while Navarro has played against players with an average rank of 169.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brengle has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Navarro has won 66% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brengle has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Navarro has converted 46.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brengle 0 - 3 Navarro
21
Total
0
Mast
20
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
260
Rank
35
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total3
0
Hard1
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
23
Rank
20
High
22
Age
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (556-436)
Career Total W/L
64% (172-97)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
73% (22-8)
$2,482,006
Career Prize Money
$964,525
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Madison Brengle | Emma Navarro |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 3 |
Sets Won | 2 | 6 |
Games Won | 24 | 44 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 13 |
Avg Match Time | 1:34:10 | 1:34:10 |
1st Serve % | 73% (161/222) | 58% (136/234) |
1st Serve Win% | 49% (79/161) | 65% (89/136) |
2nd Serve Win% | 38% (23/61) | 47% (46/98) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (10/24) | 53% (20/38) |
Return Points W% | 42% (99/234) | 54% (120/222) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (2/2) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
Emma Navarro
Player
Madison Brengle
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
5-7 6-2 6-3 |
Emma Navarro
Player
Madison Brengle
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
104
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
6-7(4) 6-2 3-0 ret. |
Emma Navarro
Player
Madison Brengle
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
80%
(
74 of
93)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Madison Brengle | Emma Navarro |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (22/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (48/29) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (387/320) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (21/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.11 |
Aces Total | 0 | 39 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
DFs Total | 0 | 53 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:50:50 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 95.23 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1533/2303) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (965/1533) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (370/770) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (142/311) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (1108/2414) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (11/3) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (22/30) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (13/17) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/15) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (16/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (14/7) |
Madison Brengle Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Madison Brengle
Player
Johanne Svendsen
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
24 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Madison Brengle
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Madison Brengle
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Linda Noskova
Player
Madison Brengle
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Madison Brengle
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Madison Brengle
Player
Irina Khromacheva
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
F |
Xinyu Wang
Player
Madison Brengle
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
86%
(
49 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Madison Brengle
Player
Su Jeong Jang
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Madison Brengle
Player
Mary Stoiana
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more