Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Madelief Hageman vs Noka Juric Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hageman vs Juric analysis and find out who is favored!
Madelief Hageman vs Noka Juric Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hageman has won 43.06% of points on his second serve, while Juric has won 39.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hageman, in recent form, has won 56.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Juric has won 55.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.62% and 42.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hageman has saved 47.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Juric has saved 52.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hageman has won 48.39% of matches played (W/L 30/ 32), with Juric winning 36.59% (W/L 15/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 82/ 79), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Juric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 64/ 67), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.73% of matches (W/L 29/ 26), where as Juric has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.16% of matches (W/L 14/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hageman winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hageman winning 2 and Juric winning 1. The last match between Hageman and Juric was at the W15 Kursumlijska Banja, 02-05-2023, First, Clay with Madelief Hageman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hageman and Juric have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hageman winning 1 times and Juric 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hageman winning 0, and Juric 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hageman has played against opponents with an average rank of 109.42 while Juric has played against players with an average rank of 62.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hageman has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Juric has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hageman has converted 46.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Juric has converted 47.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hageman 1 - 0 Juric
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
50% (86-85)
Career Total W/L
46% (64-74)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Madelief Hageman | Noka Juric |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:44:0 | 2:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (74/102) | 65% (63/97) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (43/74) | 51% (32/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (13/28) | 44% (15/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (8/19) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (50/97) | 45% (46/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Madelief Hageman
Player
Noka Juric
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Madelief Hageman | Noka Juric |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 44% (7/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (28/18) | 46% (17/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (233/180) | 49% (159/168) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 50% (7/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:53 | 1:10:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 119.79 | 120.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (624/978) | 72% (556/772) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (373/624) | 51% (282/556) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (166/354) | 40% (86/216) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (63/137) | 45% (38/84) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (465/990) | 45% (317/699) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (11/7) | 58% (7/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (7/0) |
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
12
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katerina Tsygourova
Player
Madelief Hageman
82%
(
91 of
111)
1st Serve %
77%
(
111 of
145)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
51%
(
57 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
75 of
145)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Tamara Kostic
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Madelief Hageman
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Sramkova
Player
Madelief Hageman
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Elisabeth Junge-Ilges
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Stefana Lazar
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Noka Juric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Noka Juric
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
55 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Vanik
Player
Noka Juric
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Noka Juric
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diletta Cherubini
Player
Noka Juric
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noka Juric
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 1-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Noka Juric
Player
Menuha Popovici
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
52%
(
39 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Diletta Cherubini
Player
Noka Juric
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Hageman Vs Juric Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Madelief Hageman
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
