Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Madelief Hageman vs Krystyna Pochtovyk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hageman vs Pochtovyk analysis and find out who is favored!
Madelief Hageman vs Krystyna Pochtovyk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hageman has won 43.06% of points on his second serve, while Pochtovyk has won 41.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hageman, in recent form, has won 56.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pochtovyk has won 53.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.62% and 48.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hageman has saved 47.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pochtovyk has saved 51.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hageman has won 48.39% of matches played (W/L 30/ 32), with Pochtovyk winning 48.39% (W/L 15/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 82/ 79), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Pochtovyk has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 48/ 45), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.73% of matches (W/L 29/ 26), where as Pochtovyk has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hageman winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hageman winning 0 and Pochtovyk winning 2. The last match between Hageman and Pochtovyk was at the W15 Antalya, 14-12-2021, Q3, Clay with Krystyna Pochtovyk getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hageman and Pochtovyk have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hageman winning 0 times and Pochtovyk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hageman winning 0, and Pochtovyk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hageman has played against opponents with an average rank of 109.42 while Pochtovyk has played against players with an average rank of 92.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hageman has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pochtovyk has won 17% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hageman has converted 46.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pochtovyk has converted 54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hageman 0 - 1 Pochtovyk
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
50% (86-85)
Career Total W/L
50% (48-48)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
50% (7-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Madelief Hageman | Krystyna Pochtovyk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Madelief Hageman | Krystyna Pochtovyk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 50% (7/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (28/18) | 53% (16/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (233/180) | 54% (145/126) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 50% (7/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:53 | 1:2:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 119.79 | 161.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (624/978) | 70% (362/514) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (373/624) | 50% (182/362) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (166/354) | 41% (63/152) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (63/137) | 49% (37/76) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (465/990) | 49% (254/522) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (11/7) | 55% (6/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 50% (7/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (7/0) |
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
12
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katerina Tsygourova
Player
Madelief Hageman
82%
(
91 of
111)
1st Serve %
77%
(
111 of
145)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
51%
(
57 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
75 of
145)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Tamara Kostic
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Madelief Hageman
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Sramkova
Player
Madelief Hageman
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Elisabeth Junge-Ilges
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Stefana Lazar
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Krystyna Pochtovyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Giuliana Bestetti
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
90%
(
72 of
80)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karolina Vlckova
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Krystyna Pochtovyk
Player
Pari Singh
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
52%
(
50 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(1) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Krystyna Pochtovyk
Player
Defne Aslanbas
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Yesypchuk
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hageman Vs Pochtovyk Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Madelief Hageman
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
