Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Madelief Hageman vs Isabelle Haverlag Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hageman vs Haverlag analysis and find out who is favored!
Madelief Hageman vs Isabelle Haverlag Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hageman has won 41.72% of points on his second serve, while Haverlag has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hageman, in recent form, has won 54.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Haverlag has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hageman has saved 46.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Haverlag has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hageman has won 48.39% of matches played (W/L 30/ 32), with Haverlag winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 82/ 79), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Haverlag has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 9/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.73% of matches (W/L 29/ 26), where as Haverlag has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hageman winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hageman winning 2 and Haverlag winning 0. The last match between Hageman and Haverlag was at the Alkmaar, 23-06-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Madelief Hageman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hageman and Haverlag have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hageman winning 0 times and Haverlag 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hageman winning 0, and Haverlag 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hageman has played against opponents with an average rank of 109.42 while Haverlag has played against players with an average rank of 444.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hageman has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Haverlag has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hageman has converted 46.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Haverlag has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hageman 1 - 0 Haverlag
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
50% (86-85)
Career Total W/L
35% (32-59)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Madelief Hageman | Isabelle Haverlag |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Madelief Hageman | Isabelle Haverlag |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (28/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (233/180) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:44 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 119.79 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (582/909) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (349/582) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (148/327) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (57/123) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (426/914) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Katerina Tsygourova
Player
Madelief Hageman
82%
(
91 of
111)
1st Serve %
77%
(
111 of
145)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
51%
(
57 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
75 of
145)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Tamara Kostic
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Madelief Hageman
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Sramkova
Player
Madelief Hageman
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Elisabeth Junge-Ilges
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Stefana Lazar
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Bianca Bulat
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Isabelle Haverlag Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Isabelle Haverlag
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Isabelle Haverlag
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
16 of
37)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Isabelle Haverlag
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Isabelle Haverlag
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Isabelle Haverlag
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oana Gavrila
Player
Isabelle Haverlag
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
10
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
Player
Isabelle Haverlag
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
61)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Isabelle Haverlag
41%
(
38 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
91)
6
Aces
2
18
Double Faults
10
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
41%
(
22 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
49%
(
45 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(2) 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Hageman Vs Haverlag Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
