M. Inglis
To Win
E. Shibahara
To Win
Maddison Inglis vs Sayaka Ishii Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W L W W
Form
L W W W L L L W L LHead-To-Head: Inglis 2 - 1 Ishii
They have played 8 sets in total, with Inglis winning 5 and Ishii winning 3. The last match between Inglis and Ishii was at the W75 Brisbane, 07-02-2025, Quarterfinals, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | 2 |
| Sayaka Ishii | 1 |
W75 Brisbane(07-02-2025)
6
4
7
5
| Inglis | Stats | Ishii |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (17-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (11-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 134 | Ranking | 215 |
| 112 | Highest Rank | 188 |
| 27 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (295-197) | Career Total W/L | 62% (103-62) |
| $460,080 | Career Prize Money | $75,020 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sayaka Ishii
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
||||
| 1-6 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sayaka Ishii
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 41 | Games Won | 37 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 25 |
| 2:34:20 | Average Match Time | 2:34:20 |
| 66% (150/229) | 1st Serve % | 57% (175/308) |
| 70% (105/150) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (102/175) |
| 41% (32/79) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (62/133) |
| 32% (13/41) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (11/22) |
| 47% (144/308) | Return Points Win % | 40% (92/229) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Hayu Kinoshita
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Erika Andreeva
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emily Appleton
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Maddison Inglis
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Aoi Ito
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Anna Bondar
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Sayaka Ishii Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lin Zhu
Player
Sayaka Ishii
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Sayaka Ishii
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Rina Saigo
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Sayaka Ishii
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Sayaka Ishii
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Sayaka Ishii
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Renata Jamrichova
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Camilla Rosatello
42%
(
5 of
12)
1st Serve %
55%
(
6 of
11)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
12
Total Points Won
11
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
12
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Sayaka Ishii
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (295/197) | Win/Loss | 62% (103/62) |
| 58% (660/469) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (224/155) |
| 53% (5473/4772) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1889/1611) |
| 62% (237/146) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (75/44) |
| 48% (21/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (19/11) |
| 36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (9/6) |
| 61% (33/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 747 | Aces Total | 261 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1312 | Total Double Faults | 670 |
| 1:28:8 | Average Match Time | 1:44:23 |
| 444.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 386.32 |
| 65% (18225/27854) | 1st Serve % | 62% (6567/10630) |
| 63% (11425/18225) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4175/6567) |
| 47% (4496/9629) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1824/4063) |
| 48% (1678/3501) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (633/1263) |
| 45% (12994/28805) | Return Points Win % | 46% (4751/10335) |
| 44% (16/20) | Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 27% (3/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (18/27) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (251/140) | Challenger W/L | 63% (88/52) |
| 78% (7/2) | Futures W/L | 73% (8/3) |
| 60% (291/481) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (101/161) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 65% (62/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (16/32) |
| 53% (80/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (32/50) |
| 86% (291/249) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (94/81) |
| 14% (291/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (94/12) |
| 23% (201/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (71/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
