Maddison Inglis vs Kristina Dmitruk Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L W W L
Form
W L W L L W L W W LH2H: Inglis 0 - 1 Dmitruk
They have played 2 sets in total, with Inglis winning 0 and Dmitruk winning 2. The last match between Inglis and Dmitruk was at the French Open - Paris, 21-05-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Clay, with Kristina Dmitruk getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | 0 |
| Kristina Dmitruk | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(21-05-2025)
Kristina Dmitruk
Maddison Inglis
7
5
6
3
| Inglis | Stats | Dmitruk |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (20-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (14-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 146 | Ranking | 200 |
| 112 | Highest Rank | 196 |
| 27 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 6 |
| 59% (298-203) | Career Total W/L | 64% (129-73) |
| $518,100 | Career Prize Money | $37,879 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lehecka VS Diallo PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Maddison Inglis
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:21:0 | Average Match Time | 1:21:0 |
| 64% (35/55) | 1st Serve % | 77% (50/65) |
| 43% (15/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (30/50) |
| 45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8/15) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (6/8) |
| 42% (27/65) | Return Points Win % | 56% (31/55) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Inglis vs Dmitruk Match Preview :
- How does each player fare in second serve points? Inglis has an edge with 40.82% win rate, slightly surpassing Dmitruk's 37.34%.
- While analyzing the ability to return, Dmitruk excels, winning 50.29% of opponent's second serve points compared to Inglis's 47.53%.
- In returning first serves, Dmitruk again takes the lead with 37.27%, significantly higher than Inglis's 30.1%.
- Under pressure, Inglis is marginally better, saving 48.16% of breakpoints compared to Dmitruk’s 45.5%.
- Overall performance in the last year leans slightly towards Dmitruk with a 70% win rate over Inglis's 63.89%.
- Both players prefer hard courts, but Dmitruk has a higher win percentage on this surface at 72%, showing a potential advantage over Inglis's 62%.
- Has tournament level had an impact on performance? While both have played most matches at Challengers/ITF > $10K events, Dmitruk leads with a 69.49% win rate.
- Inglis has faced slightly stronger competition, with an opponent average rank of 271.51 compared to Dmitruk's 348.73.
- In deciding sets, Inglis just edges out Dmitruk with a 48% win rate versus 47%.
- Considering break point conversion, Dmitruk is more proficient, converting 51.72% of opportunities compared to Inglis's 32.18%.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head comparison between Inglis and Dmitruk presents an interesting dynamic. Inglis demonstrates a stronger second serve performance, which often correlates with positive match outcomes. However, Dmitruk's superior ability to convert return games, especially on first serves, could be pivotal.
Despite similar tournament levels, Dmitruk's higher win percentage in the past year suggests a consistent form. Inglis faces tougher opponents on paper, possibly explaining some of the disparity in their records.
Surface preferences highlight Dmitruk's advantage on hard courts, with a formidable 72% win rate. This plays in his favor, given that both players' matches frequently occur on this surface.
Considering Dmitruk's proficiency in break point conversion and superior return stats, he seems to have a slight upper hand. Thus, Dmitruk is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match, although Inglis could certainly put up a strong challenge.
Inglis vs Dmitruk Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Maddison Inglis
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
12
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
6
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Priscilla Hon
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Maddison Inglis
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Maddison Inglis
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kristina Dmitruk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Kristina Dmitruk
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
84%
(
67 of
80)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Maddison Inglis
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Sijia Wei
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renata Jamrichova
Player
Kristina Dmitruk
0%
(
0 of
1)
1st Serve %
100%
(
4 of
4)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
5
Total Points Won
0
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
87%
(
55 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kristina Dmitruk
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alevtina Ibragimova
Player
Kristina Dmitruk
74%
(
75 of
101)
1st Serve %
82%
(
74 of
90)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (298/203) | Win/Loss | 64% (129/73) |
| 58% (668/481) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (279/166) |
| 53% (5559/4866) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2214/1771) |
| 62% (237/148) | Hard Win/Loss | 72% (69/27) |
| 47% (22/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (51/33) |
| 36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 60% (35/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 779 | Aces Total | 200 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1347 | Total Double Faults | 387 |
| 1:28:9 | Average Match Time | 1:28:29 |
| 444.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 429.88 |
| 65% (18544/28394) | 1st Serve % | 68% (8358/12323) |
| 63% (11636/18544) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4917/8358) |
| 47% (4595/9850) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1955/3965) |
| 48% (1704/3560) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (864/1677) |
| 45% (13235/29392) | Return Points Win % | 49% (6044/12356) |
| 45% (17/21) | Slam W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 27% (3/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (20/28) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 64% (251/144) | Challenger W/L | 66% (101/53) |
| 78% (7/2) | Futures W/L | 61% (23/15) |
| 60% (294/490) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (127/199) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 65% (62/96) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (18/35) |
| 52% (80/154) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (20/42) |
| 85% (295/252) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (130/116) |
| 15% (295/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (130/14) |
| 22% (206/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (72/13) |
Inglis vs. Dmitruk Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
