Maddison Inglis vs Iryna Shymanovich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L W W L
Form
W W L L W W L W W LH2H: Inglis 1 - 0 Shymanovich
They have played 2 sets in total, with Inglis winning 2 and Shymanovich winning 0. The last match between Inglis and Shymanovich was at the French Open - Paris, 19-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | 1 |
| Iryna Shymanovich | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(19-05-2025)
Maddison Inglis
Iryna Shymanovich
6
1
6
1
| Inglis | Stats | Shymanovich |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (20-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (30-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 146 | Ranking | 170 |
| 112 | Highest Rank | 154 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 14 |
| 59% (298-203) | Career Total W/L | 67% (292-143) |
| $518,100 | Career Prize Money | $219,110 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Popyrin VS Vukic PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Inglis VS Shymanovich H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Inglis VS Shymanovich H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:5:0 | Average Match Time | 1:5:0 |
| 48% (24/50) | 1st Serve % | 51% (21/41) |
| 75% (18/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (11/21) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/7) |
| 56% (23/41) | Return Points Win % | 32% (16/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Inglis vs Shymanovich Match Preview :
- In terms of recent second serve success, Inglis is slightly ahead, securing 40.96% of points compared to Shymanovich's 36.8%. Would this impact the match outcome? Possibly, as there's a noticeable link between second serve effectiveness and match results.
- Analyzing return game stats, Shymanovich shines with a higher percentage of points won on both second serve returns (50.52%) and first serve returns (33.98%), surpassing Inglis, who stands at 47.85% and 30.21%, respectively. This advantage may influence who is favored in their head-to-head encounter.
- Under pressure, Shymanovich and Inglis show nearly identical proficiency in saving breakpoints, with Shymanovich at 48.54% and Inglis at 48.29%. Does this suggest they'd perform similarly in critical moments?
- Long-term performance reveals that Inglis has a marginally higher win rate over the past year (63.38% compared to Shymanovich's 61.64%), indicating consistent outcomes around their abilities.
- When we consider surface preferences, Shymanovich excels on clay (70% win rate), while Inglis prefers hard courts (62% win rate). How critical are these preferences? They could determine respective edges based on the playing surface.
- Examining their tournament levels, Inglis boasts a slightly stronger success rate in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K with a 66.67% win rate, versus Shymanovich's 63.08%.
- In terms of opponent quality faced, Inglis has been up against slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 272.99 compared to Shymanovich's 296.79.
- Close matches involving a deciding set show Shymanovich to have a minimal edge with a 50% success rate, as opposed to Inglis who has 48%.
- Finally, considering how players convert breakpoint opportunities, Shymanovich leads significantly, converting 45.92% of breakpoints versus Inglis's 33.53%, a critical stat for live betting strategies.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the upcoming match between Shymanovich and Inglis, several key metrics suggest potential outcomes. Inglis seems to hold an edge when it comes to the effectiveness of her second serve, an area that often correlates strongly with match success. However, Shymanovich counters with superior return game stats, which are crucial for breaking her opponent's serve and maintaining pressure.
Both players are similarly adept at managing critical situations, as shown by their comparable breakpoint saving percentages. Still, Shymanovich has a distinct advantage in converting breakpoint opportunities, a factor that might shape the match dynamics significantly.
From a surface perspective, Shymanovich's preference for clay may not prove decisive unless the match is on clay, where she boasts a remarkably high win rate. Meanwhile, Inglis's slightly better performance record against higher-ranked opposition and her performance in deciding sets may counterbalance this.
Ultimately, the stats suggest that Shymanovich's adeptness at crucial returns and her proficiency in converting breakpoints provide her a slight upper hand. Thus, based on these metrics, Shymanovich appears to be the more likely winner in this forthcoming encounter.
Inglis vs Shymanovich Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Maddison Inglis
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
12
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
6
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Priscilla Hon
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Maddison Inglis
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Maddison Inglis
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Iryna Shymanovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Alina Charaeva
44%
(
32 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Darja Semenistaja
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
24 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Sinja Kraus
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (298/203) | Win/Loss | 67% (292/143) |
| 58% (668/481) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (632/369) |
| 53% (5559/4866) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5011/4113) |
| 62% (237/148) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (122/56) |
| 47% (22/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (147/64) |
| 36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (23/20) |
| 60% (35/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 779 | Aces Total | 422 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1347 | Total Double Faults | 907 |
| 1:28:9 | Average Match Time | 1:22:37 |
| 444.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.93 |
| 65% (18544/28394) | 1st Serve % | 59% (13787/23550) |
| 63% (11636/18544) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (8478/13787) |
| 47% (4595/9850) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4596/9763) |
| 48% (1704/3560) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1639/3307) |
| 45% (13235/29392) | Return Points Win % | 48% (11583/24068) |
| 45% (17/21) | Slam W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 27% (3/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 42% (20/28) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (9/9) |
| 64% (251/144) | Challenger W/L | 65% (188/103) |
| 78% (7/2) | Futures W/L | 81% (89/21) |
| 60% (294/490) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (285/425) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 65% (62/96) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (51/78) |
| 52% (80/154) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (83/135) |
| 85% (295/252) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (273/244) |
| 15% (295/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (273/26) |
| 22% (206/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (162/45) |
Inglis vs. Shymanovich Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
