Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maddison Inglis vs Destanee Aiava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Inglis vs Aiava analysis and find out who is favored!
Maddison Inglis vs Destanee Aiava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Inglis 5 - 4 Aiava
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Inglis has won 43.74% of points on their second serve, while Aiava has won 46.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Inglis, in recent form, has won 55.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aiava has won 57.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.54% and 36.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Inglis has saved 51.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aiava has saved 56.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Inglis has won 60.32% of matches played (W/L 38/ 25), with Aiava winning 60% (W/L 42/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 33/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Aiava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 46/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 34/ 20), where as Aiava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.82% of matches (W/L 34/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 9 times before with Inglis winning 4 times and Aiava being victorious 4 times. They have played 19 sets in total, with Inglis winning 10 and Aiava winning 9. The last match between Inglis and Aiava was at the W75 Perth, 14-09-2024, Semifinals, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:39:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Inglis and Aiava have played a deciding set 2 times, with Inglis winning 1 times and Aiava 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Inglis winning 1, and Aiava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Inglis has played against opponents with an average rank of 263.62 while Aiava has played against players with an average rank of 314.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Inglis has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aiava has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Inglis has converted 47.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aiava has converted 48.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
184
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
5
Total4
5
Hard2
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
180
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
59% (265-185)
Career Total W/L
60% (236-156)
63% (34-20)
YTD W/L
56% (31-24)
$423,460
Career Prize Money
$278,589
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Maddison Inglis vs Destanee Aiava For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Inglis VS Aiava
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Destanee Aiava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 10 | 9 |
| Games Won | 89 | 94 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 15 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:39:6 | 0:39:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (132/228) | 66% (165/251) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (79/132) | 57% (94/165) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (38/96) | 50% (43/86) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (16/32) | 61% (17/28) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (114/251) | 49% (111/228) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (4/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (5/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Destanee Aiava
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
83%
(
50 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-2 ret. | |||||
| 7-5 5-7 6-1 | |||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Maddison Inglis
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(4) | |||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Maddison Inglis
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Destanee Aiava
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Destanee Aiava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (34/20) | 56% (31/24) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (78/50) | 57% (69/53) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (635/539) | 53% (599/523) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (24/14) | 60% (25/17) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 56% (5/4) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 154 | 119 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 231 | 107 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:15 | 1:11:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.61 | 299.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (2042/3354) | 63% (1798/2865) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1347/2042) | 67% (1203/1798) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (594/1312) | 49% (522/1067) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (213/437) | 47% (156/329) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1617/3507) | 44% (1225/2813) |
| Slam W/L | 57% (4/3) | 60% (6/4) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (30/15) | 58% (23/17) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (34/54) | 56% (31/55) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 40% (4/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (10/20) | 42% (5/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (32/27) | 87% (30/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (32/5) | 13% (30/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 32% (22/7) | 20% (25/5) |
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Maddison Inglis
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Elena Micic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Alana Subasic
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Alicia Smith
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Maddison Inglis
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
107
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
110)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Saki Imamura
61%
(
66 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Maddison Inglis
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
116)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
5
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
57 of
116)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Destanee Aiava
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
83%
(
50 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Destanee Aiava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Destanee Aiava
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Destanee Aiava
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
83%
(
50 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Saki Imamura
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Elena Micic
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
67%
(
20 of
30)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Haruna Arakawa
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Destanee Aiava
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
11
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Ana Konjuh
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Mai Hontama
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Gergana Topalova
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Destanee Aiava
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Inglis Vs Aiava Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Inglis are available here and Aiava photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
