Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maddison Inglis vs Alicia Smith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Inglis vs Smith analysis and find out who is favored!
Maddison Inglis vs Alicia Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Inglis has won 48.52% of points on his second serve, while Smith has won 41.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Inglis, in recent form, has won 53.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Smith has won 57.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40% and 29.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Inglis has saved 56.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smith has saved 46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Inglis has won 58.18% of matches played (W/L 32/ 23), with Smith winning 44.83% (W/L 13/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 88/ 100), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19), where as Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 9/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Inglis winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Inglis winning 2 and Smith winning 1. The last match between Inglis and Smith was at the Cairns, 10-10-2016, Q3, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Inglis and Smith have played a deciding set 1 times, with Inglis winning 1 times and Smith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Inglis winning 1, and Smith 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Inglis has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.89 while Smith has played against players with an average rank of 68.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Inglis has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smith has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Inglis has converted 47.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smith has converted 45.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Inglis 1 - 0 Smith
263
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
662
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
59% (242-171)
Career Total W/L
46% (118-137)
65% (11-6)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$423,460
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Alicia Smith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(3) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Alicia Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (11/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (26/14) | 50% (4/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (207/157) | 47% (34/39) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 88% (7/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.72 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:27 | 2:2:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.12 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (676/1066) | 56% (124/223) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (454/676) | 69% (85/124) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (196/390) | 39% (39/99) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (67/146) | 58% (11/19) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (550/1202) | 40% (91/226) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (11/17) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shiho Akita
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arianne Hartono
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sarah Rokusek
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sakura Hosogi
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Alicia Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Alicia Smith
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alicia Smith
Player
Elena Micic
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
11
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Alicia Smith
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
7
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Alicia Smith
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mercedes Aristegui
Player
Alicia Smith
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alicia Smith
Player
Jade Otway
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
2
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
11
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
51%
(
44 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
98
|
0-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Saki Imamura
Player
Alicia Smith
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kisa Yoshioka
Player
Alicia Smith
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Alicia Smith
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alicia Smith
Player
Belle Thompson
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Inglis Vs Smith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
