G. Diallo
To Win
K. Majchrzak
To Win
Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Kamil Majchrzak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L L L
Form
W W L W W W W W W LH2H: Mcdonald 2 - 0 Majchrzak
They have played 5 sets in total, with Mcdonald winning 4 and Majchrzak winning 1. The last match between Mcdonald and Majchrzak was at the San Diego Challenger, 02-03-2025, Semifinals, Hard with Mackenzie Mcdonald getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mackenzie Mcdonald | 2 |
| Kamil Majchrzak | 0 |
San Diego Challenger(02-03-2025)
3
6
6
1
6
1
| Mcdonald | Stats | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (16-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 75% (21-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 97 | Ranking | 90 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 75 |
| 30 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 19 |
| 56% (329-258) | Career Total W/L | 65% (417-228) |
| $3,287,250 | Career Prize Money | $1,059,510 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
10
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 15 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:43:54 | Average Match Time | 1:43:54 |
| 70% (85/122) | 1st Serve % | 54% (77/143) |
| 74% (63/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (45/77) |
| 35% (13/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (26/66) |
| 46% (11/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 50% (72/143) | Return Points Win % | 38% (46/122) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mackenzie Mcdonald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
19 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
39
Total Points Won
50
|
4-6 0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
13
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Pavel Kotov
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 6-7(4) 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
121)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Darwin Blanch
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Hugo Dellien
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marin Cilic
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
11
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
44 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Carlos Taberner
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Alexandre Muller
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (329/258) | Win/Loss | 65% (417/228) |
| 55% (792/636) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (932/568) |
| 52% (7089/6558) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7740/6296) |
| 59% (215/151) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (103/53) |
| 38% (23/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (246/122) |
| 58% (56/41) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (45/40) |
| 56% (35/28) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (23/13) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 2379 | Aces Total | 2305 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1331 | Total Double Faults | 1150 |
| 1:33:2 | Average Match Time | 1:19:53 |
| 399.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 467.27 |
| 63% (25263/39953) | 1st Serve % | 59% (22632/38133) |
| 70% (17611/25263) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (16059/22632) |
| 51% (7529/14690) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8093/15499) |
| 42% (1609/3812) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1820/4071) |
| 39% (15835/40691) | Return Points Win % | 41% (15952/38506) |
| 51% (32/31) | Slam W/L | 53% (24/21) |
| 48% (41/44) | Masters W/L | 50% (11/11) |
| 80% (4/1) | Cups W/L | 57% (13/10) |
| 47% (77/86) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (30/26) |
| 64% (134/77) | Challenger W/L | 63% (205/120) |
| 68% (41/19) | Futures W/L | 77% (134/39) |
| 57% (305/536) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (404/609) |
| 45% (21/47) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 28% (7/25) |
| 50% (95/189) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (109/199) |
| 46% (82/178) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (96/185) |
| 80% (343/276) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (424/375) |
| 20% (343/67) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (424/48) |
| 22% (244/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (221/43) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
