Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maceo Simpson vs Liam Hignett Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Simpson vs Hignett analysis and find out who is favored!
Maceo Simpson vs Liam Hignett Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Simpson has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hignett has won 53.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Simpson, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hignett has won 38.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Simpson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hignett has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Simpson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hignett winning 16.67% (W/L 2/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Simpson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 16/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Hignett has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Simpson winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Simpson winning 3 and Hignett winning 2. The last match between Simpson and Hignett was at the M25 Aldershot, 14-08-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Liam Hignett getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Simpson and Hignett have played a deciding set 1 times, with Simpson winning 0 times and Hignett 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Simpson winning 0, and Hignett 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Simpson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hignett has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Simpson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hignett has won 17% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Simpson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hignett has converted 31.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Simpson 1 - 1 Hignett
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
33% (17-35)
Career Total W/L
30% (13-31)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maceo Simpson | Liam Hignett |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:30 | 1:33:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (78/115) | 54% (69/127) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (53/78) | 74% (51/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (24/37) | 41% (24/58) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (52/127) | 33% (38/115) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 10-8 |
Stats 
Liam Hignett
Player
Maceo Simpson
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Maceo Simpson
Player
Liam Hignett
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maceo Simpson | Liam Hignett |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (21/32) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (65/111) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (44/65) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (24/46) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 26% (28/107) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Maceo Simpson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Maceo Simpson
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Maceo Simpson
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yujiro Onuma
Player
Maceo Simpson
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Maceo Simpson
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Hignett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
James Davis
Player
Liam Hignett
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Liam Hignett
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Quayle
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Damian Rodriguez
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Van Der Kooij
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 7-6(5) 10-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Quayle
Player
Liam Hignett
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ronald Hohmann
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Liam Hignett
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Ali Habib
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Summers
Player
Liam Hignett
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Simpson Vs Hignett Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
