Luksika Kumkhum vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kumkhum vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Luksika Kumkhum vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kumkhum has won 44.58% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 44.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kumkhum, in recent form, has won 53.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.77% and 37.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kumkhum has saved 44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 54.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kumkhum has won 56.52% of matches played (W/L 13/ 10), with Hibino winning 54.41% (W/L 37/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kumkhum has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 326/ 156), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Kumkhum has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/ 9), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Kumkhum winning 2 times. They have played 14 sets in total, with Kumkhum winning 6 and Hibino winning 8. The last match between Kumkhum and Hibino was at the W60 Tokyo, 15-11-2022, First, I.hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kumkhum and Hibino have played a deciding set 2 times, with Kumkhum winning 0 times and Hibino 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kumkhum winning 0, and Hibino 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kumkhum has played against opponents with an average rank of 299.61 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 197.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kumkhum has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kumkhum has converted 48.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 48.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kumkhum 2 - 4 Hibino
20
Total
0
Mast
11
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
679
Rank
66
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total4
0
Hard3
0
Clay0
2
Indoor1
0
Grass0
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
3
Main
3
Minor
Form
66% (384-202)
Career Total W/L
56% (368-293)
100% (1-0)
YTD W/L
56% (14-11)
$536,963
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Luksika Kumkhum | Nao Hibino |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 4 |
Sets Won | 6 | 8 |
Games Won | 61 | 64 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 25 | 23 |
Avg Match Time | 1:23:20 | 1:23:20 |
1st Serve % | 59% (207/352) | 61% (233/380) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (122/207) | 64% (148/233) |
2nd Serve Win% | 44% (64/145) | 43% (63/147) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (20/52) | 53% (24/45) |
Return Points W% | 44% (169/380) | 47% (166/352) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 67% (4/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 50% (4/2) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
6-3 6-1 |
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Nao Hibino
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
5-7 7-6(5) 6-0 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
0-6 7-5 6-1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
6-4 6-3 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
6-1 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Luksika Kumkhum | Nao Hibino |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 100% (1/0) | 56% (14/11) |
Sets Win/Loss | 100% (2/0) | 51% (32/31) |
Games Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 51% (290/274) |
Hard Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 55% (12/10) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
Aces Total | 0 | 46 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
DFs Total | 0 | 64 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:28 |
Avg Opp Rank | 392 | 146.56 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1239/1842) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (778/1239) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (276/603) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (102/218) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (815/1869) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 100% (1/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 56% (14/25) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/13) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 75% (12/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 25% (12/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 38% (13/5) |
Luksika Kumkhum Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Mai Hontama
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Kateryna Volodko
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
En Shuo Liang
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
8
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Punnin Kovapitukted
44%
(
24 of
54)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Katarzyna Kawa
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
52%
(
35 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Rubber 3 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more