Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luke Bambridge vs Nathaniel Lammons Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bambridge vs Lammons analysis and find out who is favored!
Luke Bambridge vs Nathaniel Lammons Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bambridge has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lammons has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bambridge, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lammons has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bambridge has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammons has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bambridge has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bambridge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 32/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 9/ 16). Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bambridge winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bambridge winning 2 and Lammons winning 1. The last match between Bambridge and Lammons was at the USA F39, 29-11-2016, First, I.hard with Luke Bambridge getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bambridge and Lammons have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bambridge winning 1 times and Lammons 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Bambridge winning 2, and Lammons 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bambridge has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lammons has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bambridge has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bambridge has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammons has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bambridge 1 - 0 Lammons
Ret.
Rank
481
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
52% (176-161)
Career Total W/L
54% (78-67)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,650
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Luke Bambridge | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:26:0 | 2:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (57/93) | 61% (68/112) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (48/57) | 82% (56/68) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (22/36) | 57% (25/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (31/112) | 25% (23/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Luke Bambridge
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
14
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
56 of
68)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
23 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
31 of
112)
101
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luke Bambridge | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Luke Bambridge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Luke Bambridge
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Luke Bambridge
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
50 of
104)
14
Aces
11
13
Double Faults
6
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
59 of
74)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Luke Bambridge
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Escobar
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Luke Bambridge
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Justin Boulais
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Luke Bambridge
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bambridge Vs Lammons Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
