Luke Bambridge vs Jacob Dunbar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bambridge vs Dunbar analysis and find out who is favored!
Luke Bambridge vs Jacob Dunbar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bambridge has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Dunbar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bambridge, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dunbar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bambridge has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dunbar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bambridge has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Dunbar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bambridge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 32/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 9/ 16). Dunbar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 29/ 25).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bambridge winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bambridge winning 2 and Dunbar winning 0. The last match between Bambridge and Dunbar was at the USA F38 (Columbus), 22-11-2017, Second, I.hard with Luke Bambridge getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bambridge and Dunbar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bambridge winning 0 times and Dunbar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bambridge winning 0, and Dunbar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bambridge has played against opponents with an average rank of while Dunbar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bambridge has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dunbar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bambridge has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dunbar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bambridge 1 - 0 Dunbar
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
481
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
756
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
52% (176-161)
Career Total W/L
56% (54-42)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,650
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Luke Bambridge | Jacob Dunbar |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (44/73) | 78% (38/49) |
1st Serve Win% | 68% (30/44) | 50% (19/38) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (13/29) | 36% (4/11) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 29% (2/7) |
Return Points W% | 53% (26/49) | 41% (30/73) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
Luke Bambridge
Player
Jacob Dunbar
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Luke Bambridge | Jacob Dunbar |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Luke Bambridge Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Luke Bambridge
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Luke Bambridge
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
50 of
104)
14
Aces
11
13
Double Faults
6
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Daniel Brands
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
59 of
74)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Luke Bambridge
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Luke Bambridge
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gonzalo Escobar
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Luke Bambridge
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Luke Bambridge
Player
Justin Boulais
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Luke Bambridge
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Jacob Dunbar Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Jacob Dunbar
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Joao Hinsching
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Benjamin Sigouin
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kevin King
Player
Jacob Dunbar
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Dennis Novikov
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
44%
(
45 of
102)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
9
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Redlicki
Player
Jacob Dunbar
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Oscar Mesquida Berg
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Vasil Kirkov
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Shane
Player
Jacob Dunbar
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
14
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more