Lukas Pokorny vs Naoya Honda Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L W W L L
Form
W L L L W W L L L LHead To Head: Pokorny 1 - 0 Honda
They have played 3 sets in total, with Pokorny winning 2 and Honda winning 1. The last match between Pokorny and Honda was at the Tbilisi Challenger, 18-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Lukas Pokorny getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lukas Pokorny | 1 |
| Naoya Honda | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tbilisi Challenger(18-05-2025)
Lukas Pokorny
Naoya Honda
6
3
4
6
6
4
| Pokorny | Stats | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (31-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (13-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 389 | Ranking | 799 |
| 383 | Highest Rank | 799 |
| 23 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 58% (161-117) | Career Total W/L | 48% (25-27) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Muller VS Safiullin PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Rinderknech PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Naoya Honda
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
14
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:50:19 | Average Match Time | 1:50:19 |
| 62% (56/91) | 1st Serve % | 64% (57/89) |
| 80% (45/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (40/57) |
| 49% (17/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (13/32) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 40% (36/89) | Return Points Win % | 32% (29/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pokorny vs Honda Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Honda has a slight edge, winning 48.23% of points on their second serve compared to Pokorny’s 46.65%. Could this minor advantage influence the match outcome?
- Return Game Stats: Honda also leads in return game stats, capturing 47.96% of opponents' second serve points and 26.14% of first serve returns, while Pokorny trails with 44.92% and 23.27% respectively. This could be crucial in determining the superior player in head-to-head competition.
- Under Pressure: When under pressure, Honda excels at saving breakpoints with a 62.64% success rate, comfortably ahead of Pokorny’s 51.2%. Is Honda more composed in high-stakes moments?
- Performance Overview: Examining the past year, Pokorny boasts a better match-winning percentage of 61.54% over Honda’s 47.22%. Could Pokorny’s consistently stronger performance indicate their superiority?
- Best Surface: Both players excel on certain surfaces. Could Pokorny’s strong 67% win rate on hard courts work in their favor, despite playing on a different surface?
- Player Level: Pokorny edges ahead with 63.64% wins at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments compared to Honda's 51.72%. Does this experience give Pokorny the upper hand in high-stakes matches?
- Opponent Quality: Pokorny has competed against tougher opponents, with an average rank of 407.59, versus Honda’s 477.42. Could Pokorny’s experience against higher-ranked players be pivotal?
- Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets, Pokorny stands at 67% wins, which is notably better than Honda’s 50%. Could this indicate Pokorny's resilience when matches are on the line?
- Break Point Conversion: Honda’s superior 31.11% breakpoint conversion aggrandizes their potential to disrupt Pokorny, who converts 24% of breakpoints. Will this be a critical factor in the outcome?
Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Pokorny and Honda promises to be closely contested. Honda has demonstrated better serve and return stats in recent months, suggesting an edge if they maintain recent form.
However, Pokorny's overall win record this past year, alongside their impressive stats in high-pressure situations and deciding sets, reveals their enduring tenacity and strategic prowess.
Factoring in each player's strengths, weaknesses, and prior performances, Pokorny's consistent success against higher-ranked players and better deciding set performance makes them the more likely victor in this encounter.
Pokorny vs Honda Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Lukas Pokorny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Lukas Pokorny
67%
(
73 of
109)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Mrva
Player
Lukas Pokorny
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Stefano Travaglia
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
16
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Tomas Lanik
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Lukas Pokorny
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
3
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Johannus Monday
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Alastair Gray
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoya Honda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Naoya Honda
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
33%
(
15 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Naoya Honda
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Naoya Honda
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
14
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mwendwa Mbithi
Player
Naoya Honda
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
62
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoya Honda
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
42%
(
13 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
46
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoya Honda
Player
Adam Nagoudi
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Ouakaa
Player
Naoya Honda
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
71%
(
5 of
7)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
4
Total Points Won
3
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (161/117) | Win/Loss | 48% (25/27) |
| 57% (364/279) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (55/61) |
| 53% (3297/2945) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (543/552) |
| 67% (92/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (22/23) |
| 48% (37/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) |
| 51% (32/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0.53 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1629 | Aces Total | 101 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 576 | Total Double Faults | 151 |
| 1:29:17 | Average Match Time | 1:17:59 |
| 418.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.65 |
| 61% (10552/17237) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1613/2755) |
| 72% (7614/10552) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1072/1613) |
| 51% (3392/6685) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (538/1142) |
| 41% (671/1647) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (94/239) |
| 38% (6695/17429) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1022/2658) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (28/30) | Challenger W/L | 22% (2/7) |
| 61% (132/86) | Futures W/L | 53% (23/20) |
| 57% (153/270) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (24/51) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (45/99) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (7/18) |
| 47% (42/90) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 85% (161/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (27/24) |
| 15% (161/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (27/3) |
| 20% (116/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (25/1) |
Pokorny vs. Honda Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
