Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen vs Jesper Klov Nilsson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lilleengen vs Nilsson analysis and find out who is favored!
Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen vs Jesper Klov Nilsson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lilleengen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nilsson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lilleengen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nilsson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lilleengen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nilsson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lilleengen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nilsson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lilleengen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nilsson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lilleengen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nilsson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lilleengen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nilsson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lilleengen 0 - 0 Nilsson
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lilleengen VS Nilsson H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Caspar Schuetze
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Jack Loge
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper Klov Nilsson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Jesper Klov Nilsson
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Renard
Player
Jesper Klov Nilsson
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper Klov Nilsson
Player
John Harrison Richmond
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
74 of
104)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 6-7(7) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper Klov Nilsson
Player
Stefan Zoric
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Jesper Klov Nilsson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Jesper Klov Nilsson
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Mansson
Player
Jesper Klov Nilsson
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Thour
Player
Jesper Klov Nilsson
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Lilleengen Vs Nilsson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
