I. Denisov
To Win
S. D. P. Dev
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W W L W LForm
W L W W L W L W L WThey have played 3 sets in total, with Ratti winning 2 and Denisov winning 1. The last match between Ratti and Denisov was at the M25 Chacabuco, 31-03-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Lucio Ratti getting the victory 6-4 6-7(5) 10-8.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lucio Ratti | 1 |
Ivan Denisov | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Chacabuco(31-03-2025)
Ratti | Stats | Denisov |
---|---|---|
62% (16-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (7-6) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
N/A | Ranking | N/A |
Highest Rank | N/A | |
21 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | - |
0 | Titles | 0 |
51% (60-57) | Career Total W/L | 48% (103-113) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
- / Second
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
15 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
14 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-8 |
![]() ![]()
Lucio Ratti
Player
Ivan Denisov
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
22 | Games Won | 19 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:16:29 | Average Match Time | 2:16:29 |
65% (48/74) | 1st Serve % | 61% (46/75) |
63% (30/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (23/46) |
54% (14/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (18/29) |
50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
45% (34/75) | Return Points Win % | 41% (30/74) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the recent form of Denisov and Ratti, it's evident that Denisov has performed slightly better when serving. In the past six months, Denisov has won 45.76% of points on their second serve, compared to Ratti's 43.35%. This particular statistic shows a high correlation with match prediction accuracy and favors Denisov when assessing serving capabilities.
When evaluating return game performances, Denisov has won 40.94% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Ratti has won 42.86%. Additionally, Ratti shows an advantage in returning first serves, with a win percentage of 33.92% compared to Denisov's 26.99%. These return stats are crucial indicators in determining the favored player for their head-to-head match-up.
Regarding breakpoint scenarios, Denisov has saved 48.65% of breakpoints recently, while Ratti has been slightly better at 51.22%. Breakpoint conversion rates reveal that Denisov has successfully converted 33.33% of opportunities, whereas Ratti boasts a slightly higher conversion rate of 35.71%, highlighting critical moments for in-game analysis.
Looking at the overall performance over the past year, Denisov has secured victory in 40% of his matches (W/L 10/15), while Ratti has a higher win percentage of 57.5% (W/L 23/17). This record provides an essential overview of each player's head-to-head prediction and suggests that Ratti may have the upper hand in match outcomes.
Focusing on surface preferences, Denisov has demonstrated superior performance on clay with a career win percentage of 52% (W/L 61/57). In contrast, Ratti's best surface is hard, where they've won 57% of their matches (W/L 4/3). These stats help in predicting performance based on the playing surface.
Considering the level of opponents faced, over the last 12 months, Denisov has competed against players with an average ranking of 411.48, markedly lower than Ratti's opponents, who have an average rank of 159.3. This disparity indicates Ratti's encounters against higher-quality opposition, contributing to a more robust competitive edge.
In deciding sets, which are crucial for live predictions and betting, Denisov has won 42% in the last year, which lags behind Ratti's 57% success rate. These figures are pivotal in predicting potential long matches and decision moments.
An analysis of event-specific performance suggests that Ratti is likely to emerge victorious, factoring in superior return game statistics and a proven record against tougher opposition. These statistical insights collectively lean towards Ratti as the favored player to win the upcoming match based on recent form and overall performance indicators.
Ratti vs Denisov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Fermin Tenti
Player
Lucio Ratti
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucio Ratti
Player
Leonardo Aboian
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Victor Lilov
Player
Lucio Ratti
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lucio Ratti
Player
Ivan Denisov
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 1-6 6-1 10-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Lucio Ratti
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ivan Denisov
Player
Pablo Trochu
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
38%
(
22 of
58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Denys Klok
Player
Ivan Denisov
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ivan Denisov
Player
Kabir Hans
60%
(
73 of
122)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
12
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
46 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrei Kunitsyn
Player
Ivan Denisov
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Khazime
Player
Ivan Denisov
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ivan Kremenchutskyi
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
51% (60/57) | Win/Loss | 48% (103/113) |
51% (132/127) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (248/248) |
52% (1265/1163) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2424/2365) |
57% (4/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (29/41) |
51% (56/53) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (66/61) |
0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (8/11) |
0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
53 | Aces Total | 334 |
0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
312 | Total Double Faults | 398 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:3:2 |
239.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 307.59 |
61% (2579/4244) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4961/8253) |
62% (1610/2579) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3250/4961) |
43% (711/1665) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1624/3292) |
44% (190/434) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (351/864) |
41% (1724/4193) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3391/8378) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
14% (1/6) | Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) |
54% (59/51) | Futures W/L | 49% (98/104) |
51% (60/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (102/213) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
62% (8/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (22/46) |
52% (13/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (23/65) |
91% (56/51) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (109/88) |
9% (56/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (109/21) |
15% (61/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (107/15) |