Prediction of Lucie Pawlak [] vs Kamila Kashaeva [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L L W L
Form
L W L L W L L L L LHead-To-Head: Pawlak 1 - 0 Kashaeva
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pawlak winning 2 and Kashaeva winning 0. The last match between Pawlak and Kashaeva was at the W15 Le Havre, 16-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Lucie Pawlak getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lucie Pawlak | 1 |
| Kamila Kashaeva | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Lucie Pawlak
Player
Kamila Kashaeva
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:0:26 | Average Match Time | 1:0:26 |
| 50% (22/44) | 1st Serve % | 46% (18/39) |
| 64% (14/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 19% (4/21) |
| 88% (7/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 72% (28/39) | Return Points Win % | 43% (19/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lucie Pawlak vs Kamila Kashaeva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pawlak 1 - 0 Kashaeva
Editorial Prediction:
When it comes to the battle of second serves, who truly reigns supreme? Over the last six months, Pawlak has secured a 43.33% success rate when serving their second serve points. In stark contrast, Kashaeva commands a notable 52.63% success rate. Given the significant correlation between this statistic and the prediction accuracy of match outcomes, can we glean a favorite from these numbers alone?
Turning the spotlight to return game stats, the plot thickens. Pawlak, currently in fine form, has clinched 46.82% of their opponent’s second serve points. Kashaeva, however, surpasses this with an impressive 59.09%. First serve returns tell a different tale, with Pawlak capturing 32.41% compared to Kashaeva’s 28.13%. Such stats are often insightful predictors of who might emerge victorious in head-to-head matchups.
How do these players fare when the pressure mounts? Pawlak has demonstrated a deft touch in saving breakpoints, achieving a 43.62% success rate. Kashaeva, meanwhile, struggles with a 25% save rate, a metric critical for those invested in in-game betting dynamics. Delving into past year performances, Pawlak boasts a win rate of 51.16% from their matches, contrasted with Kashaeva's modest 28.57% justifying the odds in Pawlak's favor.
Considering surface preferences, Pawlak shines brightly on Hard courts, clinching 57% of matches. Kashaeva finds her niche on Clay, with a win rate of 32%. Both players falter on Indoor Hard courts, with Kashaeva yet to register a win. This knowledge of surface proficiency could sway the match’s outcome, augmenting our predictive insights.
Analyzing the level of competition offers another dimension. Pawlak competes predominately in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 55% of her matches. Kashaeva, on the other hand, secures only 25% at the same level, pointing to a clear disparity in performance levels. Pawlak’s encounters have featured opponents averaging around rank 270.67, whereas Kashaeva lacks such benchmark comparisons.
In clutch, deciding set situations, Pawlak has emerged victorious 54% of the time in the past year. Kashaeva, however, has yet to win a deciding set, indicating a potential vulnerability should the match extend beyond the standard sets.
Breakpoint conversion could serve as a pivotal factor. Pawlak’s recent form shows a 37.31% conversion rate of breakpoints, overshadowed by Kashaeva’s striking 50%. Such stats can offer valuable tips for those placing live bets as situations arise on court.
With a broad consensus built across these varied metrics, Pawlak edges out Kashaeva on several fronts, notably second serve performance, pressure situations, and historical achievement against these opponents’ backgrounds. Based on these statistics, Pawlak is projected to have the upper hand in the upcoming duel, cementing their status as the likely victor.
Lucie Pawlak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Lucie Pawlak
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
21 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucie Pawlak
Player
Pauline Payet
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Lucie Pawlak
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Lucie Pawlak
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Pawlak
Player
Olga Helmi
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
54%
(
65 of
120)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
14
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
56 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
65 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-1 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Lucie Pawlak
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
7
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
24%
(
8 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
55%
(
48 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(1) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Pawlak
Player
Ana Filipa Santos
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kamila Kashaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Kamila Kashaeva
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucie Pawlak
Player
Kamila Kashaeva
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucie Brun
Player
Kamila Kashaeva
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maddalena Giordano
Player
Kamila Kashaeva
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
15 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamila Kashaeva
Player
Estelle Bezos
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anina Lanz
Player
Kamila Kashaeva
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gram
Player
Kamila Kashaeva
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamila Kashaeva
Player
Cecilie Wiche
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jessica Bertoldo
Player
Kamila Kashaeva
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (55/51) | Win/Loss | 29% (15/36) |
| 51% (121/115) | Sets Win/Loss | 32% (35/74) |
| 52% (1123/1033) | Games Win/Loss | 42% (403/555) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 73 | Aces Total | 45 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.46 |
| 292 | Total Double Faults | 214 |
| 1:2:50 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 317.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 328.41 |
| 62% (2797/4544) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1297/2129) |
| 60% (1676/2797) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (738/1297) |
| 43% (756/1747) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (318/832) |
| 47% (244/519) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (107/204) |
| 44% (1960/4447) | Return Points Win % | 43% (854/1980) |
| 52% (55/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 29% (15/51) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (11/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (13/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 94% (50/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (17/14) |
| 6% (50/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (17/3) |
| 14% (56/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (34/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
