Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lucie Nguyen Tan vs Vlada Koval Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tan vs Koval analysis and find out who is favored!
Lucie Nguyen Tan vs Vlada Koval Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tan has won 43.81% of points on his second serve, while Koval has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tan, in recent form, has won 56.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Koval has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tan has saved 53.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Koval has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tan has won 55.07% of matches played (W/L 38/ 31), with Koval winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 83/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 7/ 19). Koval has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 81/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 32/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.92% of matches (W/L 27/ 25), where as Koval has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tan has played against opponents with an average rank of 204 while Koval has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tan has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Koval has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tan has converted 44.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Koval has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tan 0 - 0 Koval
525
Rank
366
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
875
Rank
339
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
49% (107-111)
Career Total W/L
58% (137-100)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,795
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lucie Nguyen Tan | Vlada Koval |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (27/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (223/224) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:2 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 149.17 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (927/1420) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (526/927) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (206/493) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (89/196) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (644/1347) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (13/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Lucie Nguyen Tan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Wozuko Mdlulwa
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Jade Psonka
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Vogt
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Jana Vanik
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mila Masic
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Marie Vogt
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Stefanie Auer
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Vlada Koval Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Vlada Koval
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Vlada Koval
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vlada Koval
Player
Katerina Tsygourova
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Vlada Koval
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Vlada Koval
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
10
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vlada Koval
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Vlada Koval
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Vlada Koval
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-5 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vlada Koval
Player
Ingrid Neel
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
7
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalia Szabanin
Player
Vlada Koval
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tan Vs Koval Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
