Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lucie Nguyen Tan vs Emeline Dartron Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tan vs Dartron analysis and find out who is favored!
Lucie Nguyen Tan vs Emeline Dartron Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tan has won 43.81% of points on his second serve, while Dartron has won 45.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tan, in recent form, has won 56.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dartron has won 51.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.77% and 37.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tan has saved 53.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dartron has saved 53.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tan has won 55.07% of matches played (W/L 38/ 31), with Dartron winning 48.78% (W/L 20/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 83/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 7/ 19). Dartron has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 47/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 21/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.92% of matches (W/L 27/ 25), where as Dartron has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tan winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Tan winning 2 and Dartron winning 2. The last match between Tan and Dartron was at the W50 Macon, 26-02-2024, Q3, I.hard with Emeline Dartron getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tan and Dartron have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tan winning 0 times and Dartron 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Tan winning 0, and Dartron 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tan has played against opponents with an average rank of 204 while Dartron has played against players with an average rank of 266.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tan has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dartron has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tan has converted 44.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dartron has converted 41.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tan 1 - 1 Dartron
525
Rank
366
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
470
Rank
364
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
49% (107-111)
Career Total W/L
53% (148-131)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
43% (6-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$823
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lucie Nguyen Tan | Emeline Dartron |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:0 | 1:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (75/126) | 68% (104/154) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (46/75) | 61% (63/104) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (23/51) | 40% (20/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 24% (8/33) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (71/154) | 45% (57/126) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-1 |
Stats 
Emeline Dartron
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
58 of
73)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lucie Nguyen Tan | Emeline Dartron |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 43% (6/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (27/24) | 44% (14/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (223/224) | 46% (136/161) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:2 | 1:49:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 149.17 | 193.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (927/1420) | 61% (619/1015) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (526/927) | 59% (366/619) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (206/493) | 43% (172/396) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (89/196) | 42% (50/119) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (644/1347) | 44% (416/950) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 80% (4/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (13/23) | 43% (6/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 25% (8/2) |
Lucie Nguyen Tan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Wozuko Mdlulwa
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Jade Psonka
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Vogt
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Jana Vanik
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mila Masic
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Marie Vogt
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Stefanie Auer
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Emeline Dartron Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Emeline Dartron
48%
(
38 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Emeline Dartron
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Emeline Dartron
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Emeline Dartron
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Cristina Diaz Adrover
70%
(
81 of
115)
1st Serve %
59%
(
69 of
116)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
51%
(
59 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Carmen Lopez Martinez
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Nikol Rivkin
63%
(
67 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
49 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Arina Bulatova
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Emeline Dartron
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tan Vs Dartron Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
