Lucie Hradecka vs Lisa Sabino Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
1 - 0
56% (431-337)
Career Total W/L
60% (429-281)
0% (0-0)
Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$1,070,691
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| stats | Lucie Hradecka | Lisa Sabino |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lucie Hradecka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Allie Kiick
Player
Lucie Hradecka
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Lucie Hradecka
79%
(
63 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Lucie Hradecka
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Lucie Hradecka
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucie Hradecka
Player
Carol Zhao
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
27 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucie Hradecka
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
6
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Lucie Hradecka
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Lucie Hradecka
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Sabino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dorka Drahota Szabo
Player
Lisa Sabino
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Miklova
Player
Lisa Sabino
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Sabino
Player
Noelia Zeballos
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Sabino
Player
Daniela Ciobanu
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Lisa Sabino
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lucie Hradecka | Lisa Sabino |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 56% (431/337) | 60% (429/281) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (963/808) | 59% (955/656) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (8646/8066) | 55% (7880/6521) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (87/103) | 54% (59/51) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (191/132) | 62% (335/203) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (146/86) | 56% (35/27) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 30% (7/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.27 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 2240 | 319 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 | 0.07 |
| Total Double Faults | 2346 | 481 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 524.35 | 551.89 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (16224/30836) | 64% (8190/12756) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11443/16224) | 61% (4969/8190) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (6523/14608) | 48% (2203/4566) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1528/3442) | 50% (935/1879) |
| Return Points Win % | 42% (13014/30949) | 49% (6559/13308) |
| Slam W/L | 39% (31/48) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 45% (33/41) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (154/117) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (199/125) | 49% (111/115) |
| Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) | 66% (318/165) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (424/757) | 61% (426/698) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 20% (1/5) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (104/197) | 53% (70/132) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (137/245) | 51% (99/194) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (416/364) | 88% (424/371) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (416/50) | 12% (424/51) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (350/63) | 20% (285/56) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
