Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lucie Hradecka vs Bibiane Schoofs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hradecka vs Schoofs analysis and find out who is favored!
Lucie Hradecka vs Bibiane Schoofs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hradecka has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Schoofs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hradecka, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schoofs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hradecka has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schoofs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hradecka has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Schoofs winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hradecka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 108/ 68), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 7/ 16). Schoofs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 229/ 135), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hradecka winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hradecka winning 1 and Schoofs winning 2. The last match between Hradecka and Schoofs was at the W60 Versmold, 12-07-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Bibiane Schoofs getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hradecka and Schoofs have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hradecka winning 0 times and Schoofs 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hradecka winning 0, and Schoofs 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hradecka has played against opponents with an average rank of while Schoofs has played against players with an average rank of 428.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hradecka has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schoofs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hradecka has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schoofs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hradecka 0 - 1 Schoofs
Ret.
Rank
41
High
38
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
869
Rank
142
High
35
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
56% (431-337)
Career Total W/L
60% (373-252)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,070,691
Career Prize Money
$166,421
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lucie Hradecka | Bibiane Schoofs |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 14 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:0 | 2:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (62/88) | 68% (73/108) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (34/62) | 59% (43/73) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (9/26) | 34% (12/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (8/18) | 60% (9/15) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (53/108) | 51% (45/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Lucie Hradecka
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
49%
(
53 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lucie Hradecka | Bibiane Schoofs |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lucie Hradecka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Lucie Hradecka
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Lucie Hradecka
79%
(
63 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Lucie Hradecka
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Lucie Hradecka
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucie Hradecka
Player
Carol Zhao
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
27 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucie Hradecka
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
6
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Lucie Hradecka
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Lucie Hradecka
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Bibiane Schoofs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nagi Hanatani
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Emeline Dartron
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Hradecka Vs Schoofs Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
