L. Darderi
To Win
M. Giron
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W L L L LForm
W L L W W L W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Darderi winning 2 and Halys winning 0. The last match between Darderi and Halys was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 24-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Luciano Darderi getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Luciano Darderi | 1 |
Quentin Halys | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(24-04-2025)
Darderi | Stats | Halys |
---|---|---|
49% (17-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (16-17) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
56 | Ranking | 48 |
32 | Highest Rank | 47 |
23 | Age | 28 |
- | Plays | R |
7 | Titles | 12 |
60% (197-134) | Career Total W/L | 56% (423-329) |
$769,320 | Career Prize Money | $2,292,375 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
22 Jun 2025 / First
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / Q3
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Luciano Darderi
Player
Quentin Halys
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 8 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:13:30 | Average Match Time | 1:13:30 |
60% (29/48) | 1st Serve % | 47% (28/59) |
79% (23/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (20/28) |
79% (15/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
37% (22/59) | Return Points Win % | 21% (10/48) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In a comparative analysis of their second serve performance over the past six months, Darderi has outperformed Halys by claiming 50.23% of points, in contrast to Halys's 48.6% success rate. Such statistics are crucial in making match predictions. Return game stats indicate that Darderi has achieved a win rate of 43.63% of their opponent's second serve points, while Halys demonstrates a slightly higher success with 44.98%. Notably, in first serve returns, Darderi leads with 24.37% as opposed to Halys's 19.04%.
Evaluating their performance under pressure, Darderi has managed to save 57.54% of breakpoints, whereas Halys shows greater resilience with a 62.03% save rate. This statistic is valuable for in-game betting forecasts. Over the past year, Darderi has secured victory in 52.17% of their matches, translating into a win-loss record of 36/33. In comparison, Halys has an impressive win rate of 67.61%, with a W/L record of 48/23.
Considering their preferred playing surfaces, Darderi has an advantage on clay courts with a 64% success rate, contrasting with a mere 17% on indoor hard courts. Conversely, Halys’s strengths lie in indoor hard courts, boasting a 59% win rate, while on clay, his win rate slightly drops to 54%. Moreover, in terms of player level over the past year, Darderi has played the majority of his matches on the Main tour, achieving a win percentage of 46.88%, while Halys has won 68.97% of his matches at the same level.
Regarding the quality of their opponents, Darderi has faced players with an average rank of 99.71, whereas Halys's opponents have an average rank of 192.27. This disparity may influence match predictions. In situations demanding a decisive set, Darderi has emerged victorious in 61% of their deciding sets, and Halys has shown victory in 67% of such situations over the past year.
When examining recent play, Darderi has converted 33.71% of break point opportunities, whereas Halys has a lower conversion rate at 24.77%. These distinctions in breakpoint conversion are essential for in-game live betting insights when a player has an opportunity to break the opponent's serve. Given these statistics, Halys appears to have a slight edge in the upcoming matchup based on overall performance metrics, especially considering his stronger breakpoint save percentage and higher overall win rate over the year.
Darderi vs Halys Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Luciano Darderi
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
11
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
49 of
60)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
20 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Luciano Darderi
69%
(
77 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
113)
15
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
53 of
75)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
31%
(
34 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
37 of
113)
114
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Korda
Player
Luciano Darderi
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
35 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
115
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrey Rublev
Player
Luciano Darderi
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Luciano Darderi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luciano Darderi
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Francesco Passaro
Player
Luciano Darderi
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jack Draper
Player
Luciano Darderi
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Quentin Halys
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
18
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Taylor Fritz
Player
Quentin Halys
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
12
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
29 of
34)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
18 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Holger Rune
Player
Quentin Halys
73%
(
99 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
81 of
143)
8
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
10
79%
(
78 of
99)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
62 of
81)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
31%
(
42 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
55 of
143)
149
Total Points Won
130
|
4-6 6-2 5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
76 of
150)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
22
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
62%
(
46 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
48 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
143
Total Points Won
133
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
11 of
46)
45
Total Points Won
58
|
6-7(4) 1-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Tomas Machac
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(4) 4-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60% (197/134) | Win/Loss | 56% (423/329) |
56% (436/338) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1012/809) |
53% (3891/3447) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (9484/8716) |
51% (25/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (125/99) |
63% (168/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (114/102) |
17% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (161/111) |
30% (3/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (23/17) |
0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.71 |
1446 | Aces Total | 6347 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
734 | Total Double Faults | 3213 |
1:45:28 | Average Match Time | 1:23:2 |
331.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 466.75 |
56% (13139/23257) | 1st Serve % | 59% (28332/48332) |
70% (9231/13139) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (21953/28332) |
52% (5231/10119) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (9581/20000) |
42% (1008/2379) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1504/3899) |
40% (9366/23182) | Return Points Win % | 36% (17690/48649) |
29% (4/10) | Slam W/L | 50% (40/40) |
37% (7/12) | Masters W/L | 38% (12/20) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
55% (34/28) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (58/62) |
63% (111/64) | Challenger W/L | 58% (228/165) |
68% (41/19) | Futures W/L | 67% (84/41) |
59% (189/318) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (407/701) |
44% (4/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (13/37) |
51% (52/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (209/397) |
61% (63/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (134/272) |
87% (183/159) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (423/339) |
13% (183/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (423/84) |
24% (148/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (326/86) |