D. Evans
To Win
B. Nakashima
To Win
Luciano Darderi vs Brandon Nakashima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W L L L L
Form
L W L W L L W W L WHead To Head: Darderi 1 - 0 Nakashima
They have played 3 sets in total, with Darderi winning 2 and Nakashima winning 1. The last match between Darderi and Nakashima was at the Hamburg Open - Hamburg, 21-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Luciano Darderi getting the victory 7-5 6-7(7) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Luciano Darderi | 1 |
| Brandon Nakashima | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Hamburg Open - Hamburg(21-05-2025)
Luciano Darderi
Brandon Nakashima
7
5
6
7
6
2
| Darderi | Stats | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| 49% (17-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (19-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 56 | Ranking | 32 |
| 32 | Highest Rank | 29 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 8 |
| 60% (197-134) | Career Total W/L | 61% (245-157) |
| $769,320 | Career Prize Money | $3,119,795 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Halys VS Medvedev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-7(7) 6-2 |
Stats 
Luciano Darderi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 14 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:47:52 | Average Match Time | 2:47:52 |
| 57% (59/104) | 1st Serve % | 65% (75/116) |
| 64% (38/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (44/75) |
| 49% (22/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (16/41) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 48% (56/116) | Return Points Win % | 42% (44/104) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Darderi vs Nakashima Match Preview :
- Darderi has a slight advantage in second serve performance, winning 48.72% of points compared to Nakashima's 47.4%. Is this significant enough to sway the match outcome? Perhaps slightly.
- The return game stats favor Darderi. He wins 42.86% of opponents’ second serve points and 24.24% of first serve returns, compared to Nakashima's 41.46% and 22.21% respectively.
- Under pressure, Darderi demonstrates resilience by saving 58.67% of breakpoints, outperforming Nakashima who saves 54.84%.
- When looking at overall performance, Nakashima has a stronger win rate of 57.33% over the last year, compared to Darderi’s 47.62%.
- On clay, Darderi shines with a 63% win rate, but struggles on indoor hard courts with just 17%. Nakashima excels on indoor hard courts with a 70% win rate, while being less effective on clay at 51%.
- Nakashima has faced tougher opponents on average, with their opponents holding an average rank of 87.28, tighter than Darderi's average opponent rank of 107.9.
- In deciding sets, Nakashima holds an edge, winning 52% compared to Darderi's 46% over the last year.
- Nakashima has a superior break point conversion rate at 38.1%, compared to Darderi’s 28.32%, which can be crucial during the match.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
Darderi and Nakashima bring unique strengths to the upcoming match. Darderi’s stronger second serve and return statistics might give him a slight edge in maintaining serve pressure.
However, Nakashima's overall win percentage, ability to face higher ranked players successfully, and impressive breakpoint conversion highlight his competitive edge.
Considering Nakashima's superior performance in deciding sets and better adaptability to tougher competition, Nakashima is more likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Darderi vs Nakashima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Luciano Darderi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Luciano Darderi
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
11
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
49 of
60)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
20 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Luciano Darderi
69%
(
77 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
113)
15
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
53 of
75)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
31%
(
34 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
37 of
113)
114
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Luciano Darderi
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
35 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
115
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Luciano Darderi
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Luciano Darderi
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Luciano Darderi
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
127)
13
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
66 of
83)
77%
(
27 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
24 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
37 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(10) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jacob Fearnley
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
94 of
138)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
41%
(
56 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
144
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Raphael Collignon
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
51%
(
20 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
12
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
71%
(
24 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
20 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (197/134) | Win/Loss | 61% (245/157) |
| 56% (436/338) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (586/404) |
| 53% (3891/3447) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5187/4578) |
| 51% (25/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (118/76) |
| 63% (168/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (35/35) |
| 17% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (65/29) |
| 30% (3/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (27/17) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.56 |
| 1446 | Aces Total | 2698 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 734 | Total Double Faults | 681 |
| 1:45:28 | Average Match Time | 1:45:10 |
| 331.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 265.89 |
| 56% (13139/23257) | 1st Serve % | 64% (18636/29290) |
| 70% (9231/13139) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (13864/18636) |
| 52% (5231/10119) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5760/10654) |
| 42% (1008/2379) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (970/2562) |
| 40% (9366/23182) | Return Points Win % | 37% (11287/30486) |
| 29% (4/10) | Slam W/L | 48% (19/21) |
| 37% (7/12) | Masters W/L | 48% (29/31) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) |
| 55% (34/28) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (84/58) |
| 63% (111/64) | Challenger W/L | 69% (93/41) |
| 68% (41/19) | Futures W/L | 74% (17/6) |
| 59% (189/318) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (218/357) |
| 44% (4/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (23/41) |
| 51% (52/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (124/223) |
| 61% (63/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (63/127) |
| 87% (183/159) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (246/211) |
| 13% (183/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (246/35) |
| 24% (148/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (155/32) |
Darderi vs. Nakashima Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
