C. Taberner
To Win
V. Gaubas
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W L LForm
L L L W L L L W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Poullain winning 2 and Gaubas winning 1. The last match between Poullain and Gaubas was at the Pau Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Lucas Poullain getting the victory 5-7 6-2 6-0.
Pau Challenger(18-02-2025)
17 Mar 2025 / First
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 6-2 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Poullain
Player
Vilius Gaubas
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
74
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When it comes to predicting the outcome of a tennis match, a careful analysis of various factors can provide valuable insights. Let us delve into some crucial statistics and performance indicators surrounding the upcoming match between Poullain and Gaubas.
Examining their recent form over the past six months, Poullain has displayed an impressive second serve performance, winning 50.18% of the points. Gaubas, on the other hand, has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 46.55%. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Turning our attention to return game statistics, Poullain has demonstrated a commendable record in recent form. They have triumphed in 56.72% of their opponent's second serve points, showcasing their ability to seize crucial opportunities. In contrast, Gaubas has achieved a success rate of 52.89%. The numbers for first serve returns stand at 37.22% and 28.43% for Poullain and Gaubas, respectively. These statistics bear a substantial correlation with determining the favorite in this impending head-to-head matchup.
An intriguing aspect to consider is how players perform under pressure, particularly when facing breakpoints. Poullain has proven highly adept at saving breakpoints, successfully defending 59.92% of them in recent form. Gaubas, while not far behind, has displayed a slightly lower save rate of 58.12%. Such figures serve as useful indicators for in-game betting predictions.
Gauging the overall performance of these players, Poullain has emerged victoriously in 62.12% of their matches played over the past year (with a win/loss record of 41/25), while Gaubas boasts a respectable 54.32% success rate (win/loss 44/37). Considering their head-to-head encounters, these statistics provide a comprehensive overview for making predictions in this highly anticipated match.
A player's preferred surface can significantly influence their performance. Poullain has exhibited their strongest career win percentage on Hard courts, triumphing in an impressive 68% of matches (W/L 103/49). Conversely, their success rate drops slightly to 63% on Clay (W/L 42/25). Gaubas, on the other hand, excels on Clay, where they hold a career win percentage of 63% (W/L 112/66). Their less favorable surface is Indoor Hard, with a win percentage of only 20% (W/L 2/8).
When analyzing player statistics to predict the favorite, it is essential to consider the level at which they have been competing. Over the past year, Poullain has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments ($10K), achieving an impressive 68.57% success rate (W/L 24/11). In contrast, Gaubas has predominantly played in Challenger/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K, winning 54.84% of matches (W/L 34/28). Therefore, assessing their statistics in relation to event levels is crucial in making accurate predictions.
The calibre of opponents faced by each player can shed further light on their performance. Poullain, over the past 12 months, has encountered opponents with an average rank of 442.68. In contrast, Gaubas has faced players with an average rank of 330.73. Examining these statistics provides valuable context for predicting their performance in the upcoming match.
For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is crucial to analyze the players' performance in deciding sets. Poullain has won 50% of the deciding sets played over the past 12 months, which reflects their ability to excel under pressure. Gaubas, exhibiting an even higher success rate of 61% in all matches played on the tour, demonstrates their resilience when the stakes are high.
While past performances play a significant role in predicting tennis matches, it is also imperative to examine current event statistics. These can serve as indicators of players' form and their potential outcomes. By referring to the section below for current event stats, one can gain valuable insights into the in-form players' performances. Additionally, it is important to consider whether certain players exhibit superior performance at specific events, as this can influence the ultimate outcome.
An essential statistic to consider is the players' ability to convert breakpoint opportunities into points. Poullain, in recent form, has capitalized on 48.55% of such chances, displaying their capabilities in crucial moments. Conversely, Gaubas has achieved a success rate of 42.24% when presented with opportunities to break their opponents' serve. These numbers serve as vital cues for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
For those intrigued by predictive models in tennis, an informative article serves as an excellent starting point. It presents a comprehensive analysis of both data-driven approaches and expert insights, offering valuable resources for avid fans and statistics enthusiasts.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Naoya Honda
Player
Lucas Poullain
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Henri Squire
Player
Lucas Poullain
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
12
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Poullain
Player
Kris Van Wyk
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lukas Klein
Player
Lucas Poullain
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Poullain
Player
Vilius Gaubas
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Poullain
Player
Alexey Vatutin
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Poullain
Player
Kaito Uesugi
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Anton Matusevich
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Poullain
Player
Blake Mott
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marcello Serafini
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve %
62%
(
8 of
13)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
92%
(
12 of
13)
25
Total Points Won
3
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dino Prizmic
Player
Vilius Gaubas
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Mees Rottgering
74%
(
72 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
33 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Dominic Stricker
84%
(
62 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Poullain
Player
Vilius Gaubas
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Vilius Gaubas
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
75 of
100)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Vilius Gaubas
76%
(
73 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
72%
(
76 of
105)
1st Serve %
74%
(
78 of
106)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
78)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Rubber 4 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Rubber 2 | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Gaubas