Luca Parenti vs Jan Hrazdil Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W L L W L W W W L
Form
W L L L W L W W L LHead-to-head: Parenti 1 - 0 Hrazdil
They have played 2 sets in total, with Parenti winning 2 and Hrazdil winning 0. The last match between Parenti and Hrazdil was at the M25 Trento, 19-02-2025, First, I.hard with Luca Parenti getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
M25 Trento(19-02-2025)
6
4
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Parenti
Player
Jan Hrazdil
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
24 of
58)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
17
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
4
3
Aces (Total)
3
1
Total Double Faults
17
1:16:4
Average Match Time
1:16:4
49% (25/51)
1st Serve %
41% (24/58)
76% (19/25)
1st Serve Win %
79% (19/24)
69% (18/26)
2nd Serve Win %
29% (10/34)
100% (4/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/2)
50% (29/58)
Return Points Win %
27% (14/51)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Luca Parenti vs Jan Hrazdil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Luca Parenti 1 - 0 Jan Hrazdil
- Recent Performance Analysis - Second Serve: Examining their performance over the past six months, it is evident that Parenti has exhibited formidable prowess on their second serve, claiming victory in an impressive 53.57% of points. Conversely, Hrazdil has achieved a respectable 42.86% triumph rate. It is worth noting the substantial correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Insights on Return Game Statistics: Delving into the return game statistics, we find that in recent form, Parenti has shown exceptional ability by capturing 48.55% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Hrazdil has secured a slightly higher percentage of 50.3%. Furthermore, when considering the first serve returns, Parenti has recorded a rate of 28.68%, while Hrazdil has achieved 30.32%. The degree to which these numbers align with match predictions in their head-to-head (H2H) showdown is notably significant.
- Under Pressure Analysis: A crucial statistic for in-game betting predictions lies in the players' ability to save breakpoints. Notably, Parenti has displayed remarkable composure by saving an impressive 67.35% of breakpoints in recent form. Conversely, Hrazdil has exhibited commendable resilience, saving 55.45% of such critical moments.
- Comprehensive Performance Overview: Examining the past year's performance, Parenti has emerged triumphant in 48.72% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 19-20. In comparison, Hrazdil has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 48.15%, with a win-loss record of 26-28. These statistics provide us with a holistic outlook for predicting outcomes in their head-to-head encounters.
- Determining the Best Surface: Analyzing the players' performance on different surfaces reveals intriguing insights. On clay, Parenti has showcased their dominance with a 39% win rate (32-50) - their highest career surface win percentage. On the contrary, their least successful surface is hard court, where they secure a win rate of 36% (4-7). Hrazdil, on the other hand, achieves their best career win percentage of 52% (29-27) on clay, while their least favored surface is hard court, with a win rate of 42% (10-14).
- Evaluating Player Level: In the past year, Parenti has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level. Impressively, they have attained a 50% win rate (19-19) in such events. Comparatively, Hrazdil has predominantly participated in the same level of tournaments, capturing 49.06% of victories (26-27). It is important to note that when predicting the favorite, their performance statistics should be contextualized within the event level they have been contending in.
- Assessing Opponent Quality: Considering the opponents faced over the previous twelve months, Parenti has consistently challenged players with an average rank of 118.49. In contrast, Hrazdil has frequently encountered opponents averaging a rank of 240.02. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered and can provide valuable insights for match predictions.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those who seek live predictions and betting opportunities, it is noteworthy that when matches extend to a deciding set, Parenti has emerged victorious in an impressive 75% of such occasions over the past year. In comparison, Hrazdil's success rate stands at 36% when considering all matches played on the tour. This statistic holds particular significance when determining potential outcomes.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance serves as a valuable predictor of tennis matches, we must also consider current event statistics to gauge the players' current form. It is advisable to examine the section below (if available) for additional insights, as certain players exhibit superior performance in specific events. These factors should be weighed when making outcome predictions.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Parenti has demonstrated an effective ability to capitalize on breakpoint opportunities, successfully converting 30.51% of such moments. Conversely, Hrazdil boasts a slightly higher breakpoint conversion rate of 35% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. This data is of particular significance for in-game live betting, as it offers insightful tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you possess an inclination towards models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. Caution: It is tailored for the discerning statistics enthusiasts.
Luca Parenti Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Luca Parenti
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Parenti
Player
Jan Hrazdil
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
24 of
58)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
17
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Luca Parenti
Player
Alberto Bronzetti
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Parenti
Player
Sheikh Arslan Waqar
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Freek Van Donselaar
Player
Luca Parenti
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Max Westphal
Player
Luca Parenti
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jan Hrazdil Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 1-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Parenti
Player
Jan Hrazdil
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
24 of
58)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
17
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Matteo Fondriest
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Mak Mikovic
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Toby Samuel
Player
Jan Hrazdil
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Shaw
Player
Jan Hrazdil
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
11
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Shaw
Player
Jan Hrazdil
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-3 ret. | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
38% (43/69)
Win/Loss
47% (45/50)
39% (96/150)
Sets Win/Loss
49% (105/108)
47% (1142/1300)
Games Win/Loss
51% (1045/1008)
36% (4/7)
Hard Win/Loss
40% (10/15)
39% (32/50)
Clay Win/Loss
52% (29/27)
37% (7/12)
Indoor Hard W/L
43% (6/8)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.11
Aces Per Game
0.18
126
Aces Total
177
0.15
Double Faults Per Game
0.35
173
Total Double Faults
350
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:5:21
162.47
Average Opponent Rank
279.65
62% (2174/3529)
1st Serve %
58% (2616/4502)
64% (1382/2174)
1st Serve Win %
66% (1726/2616)
50% (671/1355)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (807/1886)
39% (98/251)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (190/418)
34% (1136/3333)
Return Points Win %
41% (1768/4314)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)
Challenger W/L
33% (1/2)
39% (43/67)
Futures W/L
48% (44/48)
39% (43/111)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
47% (44/93)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
15% (3/20)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
33% (9/27)
57% (13/23)
Deciding Set Win %
35% (8/23)
89% (45/40)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (47/40)
11% (45/5)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (47/7)
4% (67/3)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
10% (48/5)
Other Predictions
- Loading news...