Prediction of Louise Stacey vs Caroline Billingham Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Stacey vs C. Billingham

Louise Stacey

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

222

Best Rank

359

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Caroline Billingham

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

222

Best Rank

359

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Stacey 1 - 0 Billingham

They have played 2 sets in total, with Louise Stacey winning 2 and Caroline Billingham winning 0. The last match between Louise Stacey and Caroline Billingham was at the ITF Adelaide, 12-02-1990, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Louise Stacey getting the victory 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Stacey	1
Billingham	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) ITF Adelaide(02-12-90)

Stats

Louise Stacey

Caroline Billingham

L. Stacey vs C. Billingham H2H Profile

L. Stacey	Stats	C. Billingham
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
58.14% (75-54)	Career Total W/L	29.36% (32-77)
1	Hard	0
3	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Stacey vs C. Billingham Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Louise Stacey has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Caroline Billingham has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Louise Stacey, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Caroline Billingham has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Louise Stacey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Caroline Billingham has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Louise Stacey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Caroline Billingham winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Louise Stacey has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 53/25), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 22% (W/L 2/7). Caroline Billingham has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 4/8), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 13% (W/L 1/7).
Player level: In the last year, Louise Stacey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Caroline Billingham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Louise Stacey winning 1 times and Caroline Billingham being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Louise Stacey winning 2 and Caroline Billingham winning 0.
The last match between Louise Stacey and Caroline Billingham was at the ITF Adelaide, 12-02-1990, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Louise Stacey getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Louise Stacey has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Caroline Billingham has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Louise Stacey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Caroline Billingham has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Louise Stacey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Caroline Billingham has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Louise Stacey vs Caroline Billingham Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Stacey vs C. Billingham H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Stacey	Stats	C. Billingham
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Stacey Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Nuriootpa - 22-11-1993
R3 Li Ling ChenL. Ling	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 18-01-1993
Q1 Patty OreillyP. Oreilly	L	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
ITF Kooyong - 14-12-1992
Erika De LoneE. De	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q3 Jana NejedlyJ. Nejedly	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q1 Justine HodderJ. Hodder	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Billingham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Prerov - 13-12-1993
R3 Dominika GoreckaD. Gorecka	L	7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-2	Stats
ITF Vitkovice - 06-12-1993
R3 Claire TaylorC. Taylor	L	6-0 7-5	Stats
ITF Swansea - 15-11-1993
Gaby CoorengelG. Coorengel	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
R3 Sally BouldingS. Boulding	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
R4 Alexandra ChaudhuriA. Chaudhuri	W	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

L. Stacey vs C. Billingham Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Stacey	Stats	C. Billingham
58.14% (75/54)	YTD Win/Loss	29.36% (32/77)
57.58% (171/126)	Sets Win/Loss	34.16% (83/160)
53.15% (1401/1235)	Games Win/Loss	43.78% (929/1193)
67.95% (53/25)	Hard Win/Loss	31.91% (15/32)
31.58% (6/13)	Clay Win/Loss	27.27% (6/16)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	30.00% (6/14)
60.87% (14/9)	Grass Win/Loss	33.33% (4/8)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
456.09	Average Opponent Rank	514.51
0.00% (0/1)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
63.72% (72/41)	Challenger W/L	32.61% (30/62)
22.22% (2/7)	Futures W/L	12.50% (1/7)
58% (73/126)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	29% (31/108)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
80% (8/10)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	36% (4/11)
44% (18/41)	Deciding Set Win %	23% (6/26)
80% (84/67)	1st Set Won, Won Match	72% (36/26)
20% (84/17)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	28% (36/10)
16% (44/7)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (73/6)