Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louisa Chirico vs Marina Erakovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Erakovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Marina Erakovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 46.18% of points on his second serve, while Erakovic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 54.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Erakovic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 48.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erakovic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 49.15% of matches played (W/L 29/ 30), with Erakovic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 142/ 91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Erakovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 78/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 63/ 58).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.06% of matches (W/L 24/ 23), where as Erakovic has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chirico winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chirico winning 2 and Erakovic winning 1. The last match between Chirico and Erakovic was at the Wuhan Tennis Open - Wuhan, 23-09-2016, Q1 round, Hard with Louisa Chirico getting the victory 1100038405.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Erakovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chirico winning 1 times and Erakovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 1, and Erakovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.46 while Erakovic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erakovic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 47.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erakovic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 0 Erakovic
284
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
39
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
56% (290-230)
Career Total W/L
59% (351-248)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$1,064,430
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Marina Erakovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:25:17 | 2:25:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (53/101) | 55% (58/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (41/53) | 72% (42/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (23/48) | 45% (21/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (42/105) | 37% (37/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Marina Erakovic
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
5
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Marina Erakovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (190/196) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 209.18 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (811/1287) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (482/811) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (229/476) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (68/137) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (544/1248) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Louisa Chirico
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marina Erakovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanie Voegele
Player
Marina Erakovic
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Marina Erakovic
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Anna Schmiedlova
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Grace Min
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Marina Erakovic
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
13
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Laura Robson
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
6
Aces
9
13
Double Faults
10
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Marina Erakovic
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Alla Kudryavtseva
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fanny Stollar
Player
Marina Erakovic
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chirico Vs Erakovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
