Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louisa Chirico vs Julia Boserup Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Boserup analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Julia Boserup Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 46.18% of points on his second serve, while Boserup has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 54.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Boserup has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 48.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Boserup has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 48.33% of matches played (W/L 29/ 31), with Boserup winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 142/ 91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Boserup has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 16/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 16/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Boserup has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Chirico winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Chirico winning 2 and Boserup winning 5. The last match between Chirico and Boserup was at the Coupe Banque Nationale - Quebec City, 14-09-2015, First, Carpet with Louisa Chirico getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:40:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Boserup have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chirico winning 1 times and Boserup 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 0, and Boserup 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.77 while Boserup has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Boserup has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 47.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Boserup has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 2 Boserup
284
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
80
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
56% (290-230)
Career Total W/L
48% (175-188)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$277,140
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Julia Boserup |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 5 |
| Games Won | 29 | 37 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:40:4 | 0:40:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (56/105) | 69% (55/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (33/56) | 60% (33/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (28/49) | 48% (12/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 29% (4/14) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (35/80) | 42% (44/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Julia Boserup
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Julia Boserup |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (190/196) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 209.18 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (811/1287) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (482/811) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (229/476) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (68/137) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (544/1248) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Louisa Chirico
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Boserup Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Naomi Broady
Player
Julia Boserup
40%
(
39 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
20
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
43%
(
25 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Ingrid Neel
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
10
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Julia Boserup
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanina Wickmayer
Player
Julia Boserup
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Maria Mateas
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Elitsa Kostova
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
0
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Julia Boserup
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Jovana Jovic
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Julia Boserup
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Julia Boserup
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chirico Vs Boserup Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
