Louisa Chirico vs Jill Craybas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Craybas analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Jill Craybas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 47.15% of points on his second serve, while Craybas has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 54.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Craybas has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.01% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 46.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Craybas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 50.79% of matches played (W/L 32/ 31), with Craybas winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 142/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Craybas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 51/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 22/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 23), where as Craybas has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chirico winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chirico winning 2 and Craybas winning 1. The last match between Chirico and Craybas was at the Surprise, 18-02-2013, Second, Hard with Louisa Chirico getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Craybas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chirico winning 1 times and Craybas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 0, and Craybas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.51 while Craybas has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Craybas has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 47.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Craybas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 0 Craybas
5
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
263
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
39
High
49
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (290-228)
Career Total W/L
46% (341-403)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$665,086
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Louisa Chirico | Jill Craybas |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 6-1 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Louisa Chirico | Jill Craybas |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 47% (16/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (165/166) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
Aces Total | 32 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
DFs Total | 63 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:13 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 222.47 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (683/1083) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (409/683) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (200/400) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (58/120) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (472/1077) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Louisa Chirico
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Kozyreva
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Jill Craybas Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Julia Boserup
Player
Jill Craybas
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
3
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
52 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Jill Craybas
80%
(
75 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Marina Melnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jill Craybas
Player
Magda Linette
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
36 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Oksana Kalashnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more