Louisa Chirico vs Heather Watson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Watson analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Heather Watson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 47.15% of points on his second serve, while Watson has won 51.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 54.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Watson has won 58.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.01% and 35.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 46.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Watson has saved 58.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 50.79% of matches played (W/L 32/ 31), with Watson winning 51.85% (W/L 28/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 142/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Watson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 73/ 44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 57/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 23), where as Watson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chirico winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chirico winning 2 and Watson winning 0. The last match between Chirico and Watson was at the Citi Open - Washington, 03-08-2015, First, Hard with Louisa Chirico getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Watson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chirico winning 0 times and Watson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 0, and Watson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.51 while Watson has played against players with an average rank of 166.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Watson has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 47.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Watson has converted 46.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 0 Watson
5
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
263
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
143
Rank
38
High
31
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
4
Main
1
Minor
Form
56% (290-228)
Career Total W/L
55% (403-334)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
50% (7-7)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$2,521,868
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Louisa Chirico | Heather Watson |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:58 | 1:9:58 |
1st Serve % | 56% (19/34) | 49% (34/69) |
1st Serve Win% | 79% (15/19) | 47% (16/34) |
2nd Serve Win% | 60% (9/15) | 37% (13/35) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Points W% | 58% (40/69) | 29% (10/34) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
Louisa Chirico
Player
Heather Watson
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Louisa Chirico | Heather Watson |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 50% (7/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 47% (16/18) | 53% (18/16) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (165/166) | 53% (170/150) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 33% (3/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 80% (4/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.43 |
Aces Total | 32 | 67 |
DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 63 | 44 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:13 | 1:40:17 |
Avg Opp Rank | 222.47 | 160.14 |
1st Serve % | 63% (683/1083) | 62% (619/1000) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (409/683) | 68% (423/619) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (200/400) | 53% (202/381) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (58/120) | 46% (47/102) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (472/1077) | 42% (425/1018) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 67% (4/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 50% (7/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 33% (2/6) |
1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 71% (7/5) |
1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 29% (7/2) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 29% (7/2) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Louisa Chirico
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Kozyreva
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Heather Watson Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Oceane Dodin
Player
Heather Watson
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
8
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Taylah Preston
Player
Heather Watson
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Heather Watson
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
8
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
5
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
32%
(
14 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Lulu Sun
Player
Heather Watson
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Heather Watson
Player
Antonia Ruzic
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Heather Watson
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Heather Watson
Player
Talia Gibson
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Heather Watson
Player
Hephzibah Oluwadare
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Heather Watson
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Heather Watson
Player
Veronika Kudermetova
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more